Cited by 82Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The “Flashforward Procedure”: Confronting the Catastrophe

Open access
Logie, Robin David Julian, Jongh, Ad De·2014·Journal of EMDR Practice and Research

Abstract

This article introduces the “Flashforward procedure,” which is a specific application of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). It is used for the treatment of irrational fears, for example, when a persisting fear continues after the core memories of past events have been fully processed. A theoretical background is presented, and the procedure is explained, together with 2 illustrative case studies. We describe psychological conditions and mental health problems for which the use of EMDR aimed at client’s flashforward might be appropriate, as well as indicating which stage in the therapeutic process is most applicable for the use of this procedure. Furthermore, the Flashforward procedure is compared with other EMDR applications and similar procedures in other therapies. Some implications are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/1933-3196.8.1.25

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The standardised EMDR protocol written by Jongh and Broeke was used for the flash-forward target.

    “The standardised EMDR protocol written by Jongh and Broeke (adapted into Dutch in 2003) was used for the flash-forward target.20,25”

    From EMDR treatment for anxiety in MS patients: A pilot study (2020) · cites this paper as [20]

    The 'Previous Applications of the Flashforward Procedure' section says clients’ flashforwards were processed using the standard EMDR protocol. The paper does not identify that protocol as one written by de Jongh and ten Broeke or say it was adapted into Dutch in 2003; its References instead list their work on specific phobias from 1999 and 2002. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • EMDR with the flash-forward procedure has been suggested if there is not a PTSD disorder or a past event that appears to be at the root of the patient's current anxiety.

    “EMDR with the flash-forward procedure has been suggested (EMDR ff) if there is not a PTSD disorder or a past event that appears to be at the root of the patients current anxiety.20”

    From EMDR treatment for anxiety in MS patients: A pilot study (2020) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Research Background section says flashforward EMDR may be indicated when no past trauma or negative experience can be identified at the root of current symptoms. It also discusses EMDR in conditions other than PTSD, but does not present absence of a PTSD diagnosis alone as a reason to use the flashforward procedure; the procedure is directed at anticipatory, irrational fears. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 82

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [5]5. Popky, A. (2005). DeTUR, an urge reduction protocol for addictions and dysfunctional behaviors. In R. Shapiro (Ed.), EMDR solutions: Pathways to healing (pp. 167-188). New York, NY: Norton.
  2. [10]10. Solomon, R., & Shapiro, F. (2008). EMDR and the adaptive information processing model. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 2, 315-325.
  3. [14]14. Browning, C. (1999). Floatback and floatforward: Tech- niques for linking past, present and future. EMDRIA Newsletter, 4(3), 12, 34.
  4. [15]15. De Jongh, A. (2009). EMDR and specific fears: The pho- bia protocol single event trauma. In M. Luber (Ed.), Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) scripted protocols: Special populations (pp. 575-610). New York, NY: Springer Publishing.

Authors
Logie, R. D. J., & Jongh, A. D.
Affiliations
  • Chorley, Lancashire, United Kingdom
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Journal of EMDR Practice and Research
Published
2014-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
25-32
ISSN
  • 1933-3196 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-320X
OpenAlex
W2077993667
Cited by
82
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of EMDR Practice and Research (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
EMDR, irrational fear

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review