Cited by 91Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

Prevalence and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence in Canada as Measured by the National Victimization Survey

Lysova, Alexandra, Dim, Eugene Emeka, Dutton, Donald·2019·Partner Abuse

Abstract

National victimization surveys that conceptualize intimate partner violence (IPV) as crime can contribute to a better understanding of the most severe forms of victimization in the intimate partner relationship. Based on the 2014 Canadian General Social Survey on Victimization, this study examined the prevalence of victimization resulted from physical and/or sexual IPV, controlling behaviors and also consequences of IPV for both men and women in a sample representative of the Canadian population. Given the paucity of research on male victims of IPV at the national population level, this article specifically discussed the experiences of men who reported violence perpetrated by their female intimate partners. Results showed that 2.9% of men and 1.7% of women reported experiencing physical and/or sexual IPV in their current relationships in the last 5 years. In addition, 35% of male and 34% of female victims of IPV experienced high controlling behaviors—the most severe type of abuse known as intimate terrorism. Moreover, 22% of male victims and 19% of female victims of IPV were found to have experienced severe physical violence along with high controlling behaviors. Although female victims significantly more often than male victims reported the injuries and short-term emotional effects of IPV (e.g., fear, depression, anger), there was no significant difference in the experience of the most long-term effects of spousal trauma—posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-related symptoms. This article argues that future research should explain the increased gap in reporting of the IPV victimization among men compared to women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/1946-6560.10.2.199

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An analysis of 1999 and 2014 GSS data revealed that men were similarly or more likely to suffer severe violence than female victims.

    “However, an analysis of the 1999 and 2014 GSS (victimization) data revealed that men were similarly or more likely to suffer severe violence than female victims (LaRoche, 2005; Lysova et al., 2019).”
  • Among victims of physical and/or sexual IPV in ongoing relationships as measured by the 2014 GSS, 22% of men and 19% of women experienced the most severe forms of physical violence along with high controlling abuse.

    “Specifically, among victims of physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence in the ongoing relationship, as measured by the 2014 GSS, 22% of men and 19% of women experienced the most severe forms of physical violence along with high controlling abuse (Lysova et al., 2019).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 91

Authors
Lysova, A., Dim, E. E., & Dutton, D.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Partner Abuse
Published
2019-04-01
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
199-221
ISSN
  • 1946-6560 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6579
OpenAlex
W2944240277
Cited by
91
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7
FWCI
8.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Partner Abuse (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
intimate partner violence, male victims of intimate partner violence, controlling behavior, intimate terrorism, physical violence, sexual violence, victimization prevalence, post-traumatic stress disorder, gender differences in reporting, Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review