Female-perpetrated intimate partner violence and romantic attachment style in a college student sample
Abstract
The frequency, severity, and reciprocity of female-perpetrated intimate partner violence and its consequences (i.e., injuries) were investigated in a college sample of women (N = 457). Participants were classified into one of the following four groups on the basis of self-reported physical assault perpetration and victimization against their relationship partners: nonviolent, perpetrator-only, victim-only, and bidirectionally violent. Results showed that females in the bidirectionally violent group had a reportedly higher occurrence (although not always statistically significant) of perpetration and victimization than those in the perpetrator-only and victim-only groups. Additionally, a similar degree of reciprocity was indicated by females in bidirectionally violent relationships in terms of violence severity and the occurrence of injury. Adult romantic attachment style was also examined among a subset of females (N = 328), and bidirectionally violent females were found to have the highest reported levels of attachment anxiety. Further, females high in attachment anxiety and low in attachment avoidance were more likely to report perpetrating violence than females high in both styles. Implications for prevention are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only four studies failed to find some kind of relationship between attachment and physical IPV victimization.
“Considering the specific dimensions of attachment, only four studies failed to find some kind of relationship with physical IPV victimization (Bookwala, 2002; Orcutt et al., 2005; Shurman and Rodriguez, 2006; Rapoza and Baker, 2008).”
From Exploring Relationships: A Systematic Review on Intimate Partner Violence and Attachment (2018) · cites this paper as Orcutt et al., 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 115
- Authors
- Orcutt, H. K., Garcia, M., & Pickett, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Northern Illinois University (US)
- Venue
- Violence and Victims
- Publisher
- Springer Publishing Company
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 287-302
- ISSN
- 0886-6708 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7073
- OpenAlex
- W2008865610
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Violence and Victims (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- romantic attachment styles, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, bidirectional violence, violence perpetration, violent victimization, violence severity, injuries, female university students, violence prevention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aggression, Anxiety, Courtship, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Sexual Partners, Students, Midwestern United States, Logistic Models, Women's Health, Crime Victims
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review