Cited by 115Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceAttachment and Relationship DynamicsCrime Patterns and Interventions

Female-perpetrated intimate partner violence and romantic attachment style in a college student sample

Orcutt, Holly K., Garcia, Marilyn, Pickett, Scott M.·2005·Violence and Victims

Abstract

The frequency, severity, and reciprocity of female-perpetrated intimate partner violence and its consequences (i.e., injuries) were investigated in a college sample of women (N = 457). Participants were classified into one of the following four groups on the basis of self-reported physical assault perpetration and victimization against their relationship partners: nonviolent, perpetrator-only, victim-only, and bidirectionally violent. Results showed that females in the bidirectionally violent group had a reportedly higher occurrence (although not always statistically significant) of perpetration and victimization than those in the perpetrator-only and victim-only groups. Additionally, a similar degree of reciprocity was indicated by females in bidirectionally violent relationships in terms of violence severity and the occurrence of injury. Adult romantic attachment style was also examined among a subset of females (N = 328), and bidirectionally violent females were found to have the highest reported levels of attachment anxiety. Further, females high in attachment anxiety and low in attachment avoidance were more likely to report perpetrating violence than females high in both styles. Implications for prevention are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/vivi.20.3.287

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only four studies failed to find some kind of relationship between attachment and physical IPV victimization.

    “Considering the specific dimensions of attachment, only four studies failed to find some kind of relationship with physical IPV victimization (Bookwala, 2002; Orcutt et al., 2005; Shurman and Rodriguez, 2006; Rapoza and Baker, 2008).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 115

Authors
Orcutt, H. K., Garcia, M., & Pickett, S. M.
Affiliations
Northern Illinois University (US)
Venue
Violence and Victims
Published
2005-06
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
287-302
ISSN
  • 0886-6708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7073
OpenAlex
W2008865610
Cited by
115
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Violence and Victims (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
romantic attachment styles, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, bidirectional violence, violence perpetration, violent victimization, violence severity, injuries, female university students, violence prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aggression, Anxiety, Courtship, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Sexual Partners, Students, Midwestern United States, Logistic Models, Women's Health, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review