The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of pharmaceutical mixtures in aquatic microcosms
Abstract
Pharmaceuticals have a wide range of biological properties and are released into the environment in relatively large amounts, yet little information is available regarding their effects or potential ecological risks. We exposed outdoor aquatic microcosms to combinations of ibuprofen (a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug), fluoxetine (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor), and ciprofloxacin (a DNA gyrase—inhibiting antibiotic) at concentrations of 6, 10, and 10 μg/L, respectively (low treatment [LT]); 60, 100, and 100 μg/L, respectively (medium treatment [MT]); and 600, 1,000, and 1,000 μg/L, respectively (high treatment [HT]). We maintained these concentrations for 35 d. Few responses were observed in the LT; however, effects were observed in the MT and HT. Fish mortality occurred in the MT (<35 d) and in the HT (<4 d). Phytoplankton increased in abundance and decreased in diversity (number of taxa) in the HT, with consistent trends being observed in the MT and LT. Zooplankton also showed increased abundance and decreases in diversity in the HT, with consistent trends being observed in the MT. Multivariate analyses for zooplankton and phytoplankton suggested interactions between these communities. Lemna gibba and Myriophyllum spp. showed mortality in the HT; growth of L. gibba was also reduced in the MT. Bacterial abundance did not change in the HT. All responses were observed at concentrations well below the equivalent pharmacologically active concentrations in mammals. Although the present data do not suggest that ibuprofen, fluoxetine, and ciprofloxacin are individually causing adverse effects in surface-water environments, questions remain about additive responses from mixtures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B., & Buxton, H. T. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es011055j · Cited by 7,953
Cited by
Sarmah, A. K., Meyer, M. T., & Boxall, A. B. A. (2006) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.026 · Cited by 3,326
Ecotoxicology of human pharmaceuticals
Fent, K., Weston, A. A., & Caminada, D. (2006) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.09.009 · Cited by 3,223
Household Disposal of Pharmaceuticals as a Pathway for Aquatic Contamination in the United Kingdom
Bound, J. P., & Voulvoulis, N. (2005) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.8315 · Cited by 552
Aquatic ecotoxicology of fluoxetine
Brooks, B. W., Foran, C. M., Richards, S. M., Weston, J., Turner, P. K., Stanley, J. K., Solomon, K. R., Slattery, M., & La Point, T. W. (2003) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/s0378-4274(03)00066-3 · Cited by 443
Self-citationJi, Y., Fan, Y., Liu, K., Kong, D., & Lu, J. (2015) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.005 · Cited by 439
Metadata
- Authors
- Richards, S. M., Wilson, C. J., Johnson, D. J., Castle, D. M., Lam, M., Mabury, S. A., Sibley, P. K., & Solomon, K. R.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1035-1042
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W2112251014
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.