Cited by 77Mercury impact and mitigation studiesIsotope Analysis in EcologyEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Mercury concentrations in fish from forest harvesting and fire-impacted Canadian Boreal lakes compared using stable isotopes of nitrogen

Garcia, Edenise, Carignan, Richard·2005·Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Abstract

otal mercury (Hg)concentration was determined in several piscivorous and nonpiscivorous species of fish from 38 drainage lakes with clear-cut, burnt, or undisturbed catchments located in the Canadian Boreal Shield. Mercury concentrations increased with increasing fish trophic position as estimated using stable isotopes of nitrogen (N; r2 = 0.52, 0.49, and 0.30 for cut, reference, and burnt lakes, respectively; p < 0.01). Mercury biomagnification per %‰ δ15N varied from 22 to 29% in the three groups of lakes. Mercury availability to organisms at the base of the food chain in lakes with cut catchments was higher than that in reference lakes. In cut lakes, Hg concentrations in fish were significantly related to ratio of the clear-cut area to lake area (or lake volume; r = +0.82 and +0.74, respectively, p < 0.01). Both impact ratios were, in turn, significantly correlated with dissolved organic carbon. These findings suggest that differential loading of organic matter–bound Hg to lakes can affect Hg cycling. In addition, Hg concentrations exceeded the advisory limit for human consumption (0.5 μg/g wet wt) from the World Health Organization in all top predatory species (northern pike, walleye, and burbot) found in cut and in two partially burnt lakes. Thus, high Hg concentrations in fish from forest-harvested and partially burnt lakes may reflect increased exposure to Hg relative to that in lakes not having these watershed disturbances.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1897/04-065r.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Forest fires in a range of environments have produced elevated total and methyl mercury concentrations in sediment and fish, in some cases exceeding the advisory limit for human consumption (0.5 μg g-1 wet weight) from the World Health Organization (WHO).

    “Forest fires in a range of environments have produced elevated total and methyl mercury concentrations in sediment and fish-in some cases exceeding the advisory limit for human consumption (0.5 μg g -1 wet weight) from the World Health Organization (WHO).62”

    From Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply (2014) · cites this paper as [62]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garcia, E., & Carignan, R.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal, Département de Sciences biologiques, succursale Centre Ville, CP 6128, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Venue
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2005-03-01
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
685-693
ISSN
  • 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8618
OpenAlex
W1987335201
Cited by
77
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
mercury, fish, boreal lakes, logging, clear-cutting, forest fires, stable nitrogen isotopes, trophic position, biomagnification, dissolved organic carbon, mercury cycling, Esox lucius, walleye, burbot, watershed disturbance
MeSH terms
Animals, Canada, Conservation of Natural Resources, Environmental Monitoring, Fires, Fishes, Fresh Water, Insecta, Mercury, Muscles, Nitrogen Isotopes, Trees, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Food Chain, Body Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review