The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ESTABLISHING OPERATIONS AND REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS
Open accessAbstract
Positive reinforcement procedures have had a major impact on educational programs for the developmentally disabled; nevertheless, variation in reinforcer effectiveness both within and across individuals is a common phenomenon. This study examined one class of variables—establishing operations—that might influence the effectiveness of reinforcers. Five developmentally disabled adult males participated. Responding on one of two motor tasks—switch closure or block placement—was assessed during baseline, satiation, and deprivation conditions with respect to three classes of consequences: small food items, music, and social praise. Deprivation and satiation conditions were constructed so as not to alter significantly the normal course of events in a subject's day. For example, food deprivation entailed scheduling sessions just prior to a subject's regular lunch, and social deprivation involved limiting a subject's access to social interaction for 15 minutes, during which time the subject had access to an assortment of other activities. Results showed that each stimulus class functioned as reinforcement with different degrees of effectiveness during satiation versus deprivation conditions. These results are discussed in light of previous research on enhancement of reinforcer efficacy as well as the assessment and identification of functional reinforcers, and implications are presented for future research and client habilitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“individuals with ASD respond at higher rates to social rewards under conditions of social deprivation than during social satiation, for example [227].”
From Social “wanting” dysfunction in autism: neurobiological underpinnings and treatment implications (2012) · cites this paper as [227]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kilzer, E., & Skinner, B. F. (1953) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3707860 · Cited by 8,940
DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN DISCRIMINATIVE AND MOTIVATIONAL FUNCTIONS OF STIMULI
Michael, J. L. (1982) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149 · Cited by 977
ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER VALUE WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS
Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Cowdery, G. E., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1985) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249 · Cited by 650
Self-citationA RAPID METHOD OF TOILET TRAINING THE INSTITUTIONALIZED RETARDED 1
Azrin, N. H., & Foxx, R. M. (1971) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1971.4-89 · Cited by 427
Deprivation and satiation of social reinforcers as drive conditions.
Gewirtz, J. L., & Baer, D. M. (1958) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0042880 · Cited by 286
The effect of brief social deprivation on behaviors for a social reinforcer.
Gewirtz, J. L., & Baer, D. M. (1958) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047188 · Cited by 272
A COMPARISON OF PROCEDURES FOR ELIMINATING SELF‐INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR OF RETARDED ADOLESCENTS1
Corte, H. E., Wolf, M. M., & Locke, B. J. (1971) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1971.4-201 · Cited by 202
Operant Conditioning of a Vegetative Human Organism
Fuller, P. R. (1949) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1418565 · Cited by 180
REINFORCER VARIATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR MOTIVATING DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILDREN
Egel, A. L. (1981) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1981.14-345 · Cited by 162
A PRACTICAL STRATEGY FOR ONGOING REINFORCER ASSESSMENT
Mason, S. A., McGee, G. G., Farmer‐Dougan, V., & Risley, T. R. (1989) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1989.22-171 · Cited by 153
Page, T. J., Iwata, B. A., & Neef, N. A. (1976) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1976.9-433 · Cited by 144
Self-citationREINFORCER SAMPLING: A TECHNIQUE FOR INCREASING THE BEHAVIOR OF MENTAL PATIENTS1
Ayllón, T., & Azrin, N. H. (1968) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1968.1-13 · Cited by 124
TEACHING JANITORIAL SKILLS TO THE MENTALLY RETARDED: ACQUISITION, GENERALIZATION, AND MAINTENANCE
Cuvo, A. J., Leaf, R. B., & Borakove, L. S. (1978) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1978.11-345 · Cited by 116
DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL RESPONSES IN TWO SEVERELY RETARDED CHILDREN1
Whitman, T. L., Mercurio, J. R., & Caponigri, V. (1970) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1970.3-133 · Cited by 114
Some motivational properties of sensory stimulation in psychotic children
Rincover, A., Newsom, C. D., Lövaas, O. I., & Koegel, R. L. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-0965(77)90009-1 · Cited by 90
COMPUTERIZED ASSESSMENT OF PREFERENCE FOR SEVERELY HANDICAPPED INDIVIDUALS
Dattilo, J. (1986) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1986.19-445 · Cited by 86
The effects of constant vs varied reinforcer presentation on responding by autistic children
Egel, A. L. (1980) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-0965(80)90050-8 · Cited by 74
VIBRATION AS A REINFORCER WITH A PROFOUNDLY RETARDED CHILD1
Bailey, J., & Meyerson, L. (1969) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1969.2-135 · Cited by 55
THE RELATIVE MOTIVATIONAL PROPERTIES OF SENSORY AND EDIBLE REINFORCERS IN TEACHING AUTISTIC CHILDREN
Rincover, A., & Newsom, C. D. (1985) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-237 · Cited by 53
TEACHING NONVOCAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS TO MULTIHANDICAPPED RETARDED ADULTS1
Reid, D. H., & Hurlbut, B. I. (1977) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-591 · Cited by 38
THE LIMITS AND MOTIVATING POTENTIAL OF SENSORY STIMULI AS REINFORCERS FOR AUTISTIC CHILDREN
Ferrari, M., & Harris, S. L. (1981) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1981.14-339 · Cited by 35
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT
Roane, H. S., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A. (1998) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605 · Cited by 471
Self-citationVollmer, T. R., Iwata, B. A., Zarcone, J. R., Smith, R. G., & Mazaleski, J. L. (1993) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1993.26-9 · Cited by 417
Self-citationStereotypy I: A review of behavioral assessment and treatment
Rapp, J. T., & Vollmer, T. R. (2005) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.005 · Cited by 344
Self-citationIMPLICATIONS AND REFINEMENTS OF THE ESTABLISHING OPERATION CONCEPT
Michael, J. L. (2000) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2000.33-401 · Cited by 281
FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT: CONTRIBUTIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Horner, R. H. (1994) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-401 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Vollmer, T. R., & Iwata, B. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vollmer, Timothy R.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 279-291
- ISSN
- 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3703
- PMC
- PMC1279573
- OpenAlex
- W2167077741
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- establishing operations, reinforcer effectiveness, satiation, deprivation, food deprivation, social deprivation, positive reinforcement, motor tasks, block placement, habilitation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Behavior Therapy, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Motivation, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reinforcement, Social, Token Economy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review