Cited by 141Behavioral and Psychological StudiesHuman Resource Development and Performance EvaluationSchool Leadership and Teacher Performance

TRAINING RESIDENTIAL SUPERVISORS TO PROVIDE FEEDBACK FOR MAINTAINING STAFF TEACHING SKILLS WITH PEOPLE WHO HAVE SEVERE DISABILITIES

Open access
Parsons, Marsha B., Reid, Dennis H.·1995·Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Abstract

We evaluated procedures for training supervisors in a residential setting to provide feedback for maintaining direct‐service staff members' teaching skills with people who have severe disabilities. Using classroom‐based instruction and on‐the‐job observation and feedback, 10 supervisors were initially trained to implement teaching programs themselves. The training improved supervisors' teaching skills but was insufficient to improve the quality of feedback they provided to direct‐service staff regarding the staff members' teaching skills. Subsequently, classroom‐based instruction and on‐the‐job observation and feedback that targeted supervisors' feedback skills were provided. Following training in provision of feedback, all supervisors met criterion for providing feedback to their staff. Results also indicated that maintenance of teaching skills was greater for direct‐service staff whose supervisors had received training in providing feedback relative to staff whose supervisors had not received such training. The need for analysis of other variables that affect maintenance of staff performance, as well as variables that affect other important areas of supervisor performance, is discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-317

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 5 · Cited by 141

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]4. Page, T. J., Iwata, B. A., & Reid, D. H. (1982). Pyra- midal training: A large-scale application with institu- tional staff. Journal ofApplied Behavior Analysis, 15, 335-351.

Authors
Parsons, M. B., & Reid, D. H.
Affiliations
J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center (US)
Corresponding author
Parsons, Marsha B.
Venue
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-09
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
317-322
ISSN
  • 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3703
OpenAlex
W2039399711
Cited by
141
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
Keywords
supervisor training, feedback skills, staff supervision, severe disabilities, residential settings, classroom teaching, teaching program, employee performance
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Education of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities, Feedback, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Inservice Training, Male, Patient Care Team, Professional Competence, Residential Facilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review