The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PROGRESSING FROM BRIEF ASSESSMENTS TO EXTENDED EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSES IN THE EVALUATION OF ABERRANT BEHAVIOR
Open accessAbstract
The role of experimental analyses in guiding treatment is well established. However, not all experimental analyses yield conclusive results. Outcomes may be inconclusive due to time limitations that preclude extended observation and detailed experimental manipulations, or may result from interactions across experimental conditions, multiple control, or other unknown factors. In this study, we describe an assessment sequence that moves through four phases beginning with relatively brief (1 to 2 hr) analyses and culminating in extended analyses that may control for experimental confounding effects (e.g., interaction effects). Data illustrating the model are presented for 20 individuals referred for severe behavior problems including self‐injury, aggression, stereotypy, and tantrums. Analyses were considered to be complete only when clear and replicable response patterns emerged. Results showed that clear and replicable response patterns emerged for 85% of the participants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward a functional analysis of self-injury
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197 · Cited by 2,644
Cited by
FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF PROBLEM BEHAVIOR: A REVIEW
Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-147 · Cited by 1,317
THIRTY YEARS OF RESEARCH ON THE FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF PROBLEM BEHAVIOR
Beavers, G. A., Iwata, B. A., & Lerman, D. C. (2013) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.30 · Cited by 640
Treatment utility of psychological assessment
Nelson-Gray, R. O. (2003) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.521 · Cited by 138
The Need for Assessment of Maintaining Variables in OBM
Austin, J., Carr, J. E., & Agnew, J. L. (1999) · Journal of Organizational Behavior Management · doi:10.1300/j075v19n02_05 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Vollmer, T. R., Marcus, B. A., Ringdahl, J. E., & Roane, H. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 561-576
- ISSN
- 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3703
- OpenAlex
- W2076110690
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PROGRESSING FROM BRIEF ASSESSMENTS TO EXTENDED EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSES IN THE EVALUATION OF ABERRANT BEHAVIOR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1901/jaba.1995.28-561
- The paper
- Vollmer, T. R., Marcus, B. A., Ringdahl, J. E., & Roane, H. S. (1995). PROGRESSING FROM BRIEF ASSESSMENTS TO EXTENDED EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSES IN THE EVALUATION OF ABERRANT BEHAVIOR. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1995.28-561
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.