The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RESPONSE STRENGTH IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES1
Open accessAbstract
In several different experiments, pigeons were trained with one schedule or condition of food reinforcement for pecking in the presence of one key color, and a different schedule or condition in the presence of a second key color. After responding in both of these multiple schedule components stabilized, response‐independent food was presented during dark‐key periods between components, and the rates of pecking in both schedule components decreased. The decrease in responding relative to baseline depended on the frequency, magnitude, delay, or response‐rate contingencies of reinforcement prevailing in that component. When reinforcement was terminated, decreases in responding relative to baseline rates were ordered in the same way as with response‐independent food. The relations between component response rates were power functions. Internal consistencies in the data, in conjunction with parallel findings in the literature, suggest that the concept of response strength summarizes the effects of diverse procedures, where response strength is identified with relative resistance to change. The exponent of the power function relating response rates may provide the basis for scaling response strength.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957) · doi:10.1037/10627-000 · Cited by 4,894
EFFECTS OF REINFORCEMENT MAGNITUDE ON CHOICE AND RATE OF RESPONDING1
Neuringer, A. J. (1967) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1967.10-417 · Cited by 161
Cited by
THE ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIORAL MOMENTUM
Nevin, J. A., Mandell, C., & Atak, J. R. (1983) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1983.39-49 · Cited by 451
Self-citationContrasting approaches to a theory of learning
Johnston, T. D. (1981) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00007950 · Cited by 401
BEHAVIORAL MOMENTUM IN THE TREATMENT OF NONCOMPLIANCE
Mace, F. C., Hock, M. L., Lalli, J. S., West, B. J., Belfiore, P., Pinter, E., & Brown, D. K. (1988) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1988.21-123 · Cited by 401
AN INTEGRATIVE MODEL FOR THE STUDY OF BEHAVIORAL MOMENTUM
Nevin, J. A. (1992) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1992.57-301 · Cited by 306
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nevin, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1974-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 389-408
- ISSN
- 0022-5002 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3711
- OpenAlex
- W2162998102
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RESPONSE STRENGTH IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1901/jeab.1974.21-389
- The paper
- Nevin, J. A. (1974). RESPONSE STRENGTH IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES1. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1974.21-389
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.