Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes
Open accessAbstract
Eight adult humans were taught conditional discriminations in a matching‐to‐sample format that led to the formation of two four‐member equivalence classes. When subjects were taught to select one comparison stimulus from each class in a set order, they then ordered all other members of the equivalence classes without explicit training. When the ordering response itself was brought under conditional control, conditional sequencing also transferred to all other members of the two equivalence classes. When the conditional discriminations in the matching‐to‐sample task were brought under higher order conditional control, the eight stimulus members were arranged into four conditional equivalence classes. Both ordering and conditional ordering transferred to all members of the four conditional equivalence classes; for some subjects this occurred without a typical test for equivalence. One hundred twenty untrained sequences emerged from eight trained sequences for all subjects. Transfer of functions through equivalence classes may contribute to a behavior‐analytic approach to semantics and generative grammar.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cognitive relations and cognitive functions are regulated by different contextual features of a situation.
“cognitive relations and cognitive functions are regulated by different contextual features of a situation”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes (2006) · cites this paper as Wulfert & Hayes, 1988
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports contextual control of equivalence relations and transfer of a stimulus’s function to other class members. It does not say that different contextual features separately regulate cognitive relations and cognitive functions. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 15 · Cited by 366
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Catania, A. C. (1984). Learning (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of Verbal behavior by B. F. Skinner. Language, 35, 26-58.
- Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects ofthe theory ofsyntax. Cam- bridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Chomsky, N. (1972). Languageand mind (2nd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Devany, J. M., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. 0. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and lan- guage-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243-257.
- Fields, L., Verhave, T., & Fath, S. (1984). Stimulus equivalence and transitive associations: A methodolog- ical analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 143-157.
- Hayes, S. C. (1986). The case of the silent dog-Verbal reports and the analysis of rules: A review of Ericsson and Simon's Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 351-363.
- Hayes, S. C. (in press). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Parrott & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erl- baum.
- Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A., Devany, J. M., Kohlenberg, B., & Shelby, J. (in press). Stimulus equivalence and the symbolic control of behavior. Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta.
- Holmes, P. W. (1979). Transfer of matching perfor- mance in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 103-114.
- Lazar, R. (1977). Extending sequence-class member- ship with matching to sample. Journal of the Experi- mental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 381-392.
- McIntire, K. D., Cleary, J., & Thompson, T. (1987). Conditional relations by monkeys: Reflexivity, sym- metry, and transitivity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 279-285.
- Robinson, G. (1977). Procedures for the acquisition of syntax. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 619-627).
- Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equiv- alences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5- 13.
- Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213- 245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W., & Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Exper- imental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23-44.
- Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrim- ination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
- Authors
- Wulfert, E., & Hayes, S. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Nevada, Reno (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wulfert, Edelgard
- Venue
- Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-144
- ISSN
- 0022-5002 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3711
- PMC
- PMC1338863
- OpenAlex
- W2118814247
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 16.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Keywords
- transfer of functions, conditional discrimination, matching-to-sample, stimulus equivalence, semantics, generative grammar
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review