Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prevalence and Risk Indicators for Periodontal Attachment Loss in a Population of Older Community‐Dwelling Blacks and Whites

Beck, James D., Koch, Gary G., Rozier, R. Gary, Tudor, Gail E.·1990·Journal of Periodontology

Abstract

T he extent and severity of periodontal attachment loss are described for a random sample of 690 dentate community‐dwelling adults, aged 65 or over, residing in five counties in North Carolina. In addition, risk indicators for serious levels of loss of attachment and pocket depth in this population are presented. Pocket depths and recession were measured on all teeth by trained examiners during household visits. Blacks had an average of 78% of their sites with attachment loss and the average level of loss in those sites was approximately 4 mm, as compared to 65% and 3.1 mm for whites. Because the extent and severity scores in this population were much higher than in younger groups, a serious condition in this group was defined as having 4 + sites of loss of attachment of 5 + mm with one or more of those sites having a pocket of 4 + mm. Bivariate analyses identified a large number of explanatory variables that were associated with increased likelihood of having the more serious periodontal condition. The logistic regression model for blacks includes the following important explanatory variables and associated odds ratios: use of tobacco (2.9), colony counts of B. gingivalis greater than 2% (2.4) and B. intermedius greater than 2% (1.9), last visit to the dentist greater than 3 years (2.3), and gums bleeding in the last 2 weeks (3.9). The model for whites indicated that tobacco use (6.2), presence of B. gingivalis (2.4) and the combined variable of having not been to the dentist in the last 3 years and having a high BANA score (16.8) were important explanatory variables. These epidemiological analyses confirm that microorganisms are associated with periodontal disease. However, other factors also are associated with serious periodontal conditions and the relationship between potential predictors of serious conditions may be complex in older adult populations. J Periodontol 1990; 61:521–528.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1902/jop.1990.61.8.521

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 338

Metadata

Authors
Beck, J. D., Koch, G. G., Rozier, R. G., & Tudor, G. E.
Venue
Journal of Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-08
Volume
61
Issue
8
Pages
521-528
ISSN
  • 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3670
OpenAlex
W2114953849
Cited by
338
References
0
FWCI
11.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and Risk Indicators for Periodontal Attachment Loss in a Population of Older Community‐Dwelling Blacks and Whites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1902/jop.1990.61.8.521
The paper
Beck, J. D., Koch, G. G., Rozier, R. G., & Tudor, G. E. (1990). Prevalence and Risk Indicators for Periodontal Attachment Loss in a Population of Older Community‐Dwelling Blacks and Whites. Journal of Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.8.521

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.