The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence and Risk Indicators for Periodontal Attachment Loss in a Population of Older Community‐Dwelling Blacks and Whites
Abstract
T he extent and severity of periodontal attachment loss are described for a random sample of 690 dentate community‐dwelling adults, aged 65 or over, residing in five counties in North Carolina. In addition, risk indicators for serious levels of loss of attachment and pocket depth in this population are presented. Pocket depths and recession were measured on all teeth by trained examiners during household visits. Blacks had an average of 78% of their sites with attachment loss and the average level of loss in those sites was approximately 4 mm, as compared to 65% and 3.1 mm for whites. Because the extent and severity scores in this population were much higher than in younger groups, a serious condition in this group was defined as having 4 + sites of loss of attachment of 5 + mm with one or more of those sites having a pocket of 4 + mm. Bivariate analyses identified a large number of explanatory variables that were associated with increased likelihood of having the more serious periodontal condition. The logistic regression model for blacks includes the following important explanatory variables and associated odds ratios: use of tobacco (2.9), colony counts of B. gingivalis greater than 2% (2.4) and B. intermedius greater than 2% (1.9), last visit to the dentist greater than 3 years (2.3), and gums bleeding in the last 2 weeks (3.9). The model for whites indicated that tobacco use (6.2), presence of B. gingivalis (2.4) and the combined variable of having not been to the dentist in the last 3 years and having a high BANA score (16.8) were important explanatory variables. These epidemiological analyses confirm that microorganisms are associated with periodontal disease. However, other factors also are associated with serious periodontal conditions and the relationship between potential predictors of serious conditions may be complex in older adult populations. J Periodontol 1990; 61:521–528.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Petersen, P. E., & Ogawa, H. (2012) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0757.2011.00425.x · Cited by 819
Position Paper: Epidemiology of Periodontal Diseases
(2005) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.2005.76.8.1406 · Cited by 537
Goldstein, L. B., Adams, R., Becker, K., Furberg, C. D., Gorelick, P. B., Hademenos, G., Hill, M., Howard, G., Howard, V. J., Jacobs, B., et al. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.103.1.163 · Cited by 373
Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Periodontal Diseases
Albandar, J. M. (2005) · Dental Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.cden.2005.03.003 · Cited by 358
Relationship between smoking and dental status in 35‐, 50‐, 65‐, and 75‐year‐old individuals
Axelsson, P., Paulartder, J., & Lindhe, J. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02444.x · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Beck, J. D., Koch, G. G., Rozier, R. G., & Tudor, G. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Periodontology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-08
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 521-528
- ISSN
- 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3670
- OpenAlex
- W2114953849
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and Risk Indicators for Periodontal Attachment Loss in a Population of Older Community‐Dwelling Blacks and Whites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1902/jop.1990.61.8.521
- The paper
- Beck, J. D., Koch, G. G., Rozier, R. G., & Tudor, G. E. (1990). Prevalence and Risk Indicators for Periodontal Attachment Loss in a Population of Older Community‐Dwelling Blacks and Whites. Journal of Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.8.521
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.