Cited by 1,455Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisGestational Diabetes Research and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Periodontal Infection as a Possible Risk Factor for Preterm Low Birth Weight

Abstract

P eriodontal diseases are G ram‐negative anaerobic infections that can occur in women of childbearing age (18 to 34 years). In the present investigation we sought to determine whether the prevalence of maternal periodontal infection could be associated with preterm low birth weight (PLBW), controlling for known risk factors and potential covariates. A case‐control study of 124 pregnant or postpartum mothers was performed. PLBW cases were defined as a mother with a birth of less than 2,500 g and one or more of the following: gestational age <37 weeks, preterm labor (PTL), or premature rupture of membranes (PROM). Controls were normal birth weight infants (NBW). Assessments included a broad range of known obstetric risk factors, such as tobacco use, drug use, alcohol consumption, level of prenatal care, parity, genitourinary infections, and nutrition. Each subject received a periodontal examination to determine clinical attachment level. PLBW cases and primiparous PLBW cases (n = 93) had significantly worse periodontal disease than the respective NBW controls. Multivariate logistic regression models, controlling for other risk factors and covariates, demonstrated that periodontal disease is a statistically significant risk factor for PLBW with adjusted odds ratios of 7.9 and 7.5 for all PLBW cases and primiparous PLBW cases, respectively. These data indicate that periodontal diseases represent a previously unrecognized and clinically significant risk factor for preterm low birth weight as a consequence of either PTL or preterm PROM. J Periodontol 1996;67:1103–1113 .

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1902/jop.1996.67.10s.1103

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Offenbacher, S., Katz, V., Fertik, G., Collins, J., Boyd, D., Maynor, G., McKaig, R., & Beck, J.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Journal of Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-10
Volume
67
Issue
10S
Pages
1103-1113
ISSN
  • 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3670
OpenAlex
W2160702537
Cited by
1,455
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 80
FWCI
32.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Periodontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hd026652-04, 1r03de008289-01)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R03 DE08289)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD26652)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Keywords
periodontal disease, preterm low birth weight, primiparous women, preterm labor, premature rupture of membranes, clinical attachment level, prenatal risk factors, pregnancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review