The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vertical Distance from the Crest of Bone to the Height of the Interproximal Papilla Between Adjacent Implants
Abstract
Background: As patient demand increases for more natural restorations in the esthetic zone, clinicians must have the highest level of skill and knowledge to maintain or reform the interdental papilla between teeth, between implants and teeth, and between adjacent implants. To date, there are no reports that have measured the distance from the contact point to the bony crest between implants. One reason for this may be the fact that, with two adjacent implants, the contact point of the crown can be established at any distance from the gingival margin according to the restorative dentist's specifications. Therefore, in this study, the height of the soft tissue to the crest of bone was measured between two adjacent implants independent of the location of the contact point. The purpose of this study was to determine the range and average height of tissue between two adjacent implants. Methods: A total of 136 interimplant papillary heights were examined in 33 patients by eight different examiners in five private dental offices. After administration of appropriate local anesthesia, a standardized periodontal probe was placed vertically from the height of the papilla to the crest of bone. The measurements were rounded off to the nearest millimeter. Results: The mean height of papillary tissue between two adjacent implants was 3.4 mm, with a range of 1 mm to 7 mm. Conclusions: Clinicians should proceed with great caution when placing two implants adjacent to each other in the esthetic zone. In most cases, only 2, 3, or 4 mm of soft tissue height (average 3.4 mm) can be expected to form over the interimplant crest of bone. These results showed that modification of treatment plans may be necessary when esthetics are critical for success. J Periodontol 2003;74:1785‐1788.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Den Hartog, L., Huddleston Slater, J. J. R., Vissink, A., Meijer, H. J. A., & Raghoebar, G. M. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2008.01330.x · Cited by 300
The etiology of hard‐ and soft‐tissue deficiencies at dental implants: A narrative review
Hämmerle, C. H. F., & Tarnow, D. (2018) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1002/jper.16-0810 · Cited by 164
Self-citationThe biological width around implant
Zheng, Z., Ao, X., Xie, P., Jiang, F., & Chen, W. (2021) · Journal of Prosthodontic Research · doi:10.2186/jpr.jpor_2019_356 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Tarnow, D., Elian, N., Fletcher, P., Froum, S., Magner, A., Cho, S., Salama, M., Salama, H., & Garber, D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Periodontology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1785-1788
- ISSN
- 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3670
- OpenAlex
- W2136297473
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vertical Distance from the Crest of Bone to the Height of the Interproximal Papilla Between Adjacent Implants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1902/jop.2003.74.12.1785
- The paper
- Tarnow, D., Elian, N., Fletcher, P., Froum, S., Magner, A., Cho, S., Salama, M., Salama, H., & Garber, D. A. (2003). Vertical Distance from the Crest of Bone to the Height of the Interproximal Papilla Between Adjacent Implants. Journal of Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.12.1785
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.