Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 464

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Vertical Distance from the Crest of Bone to the Height of the Interproximal Papilla Between Adjacent Implants

Tarnow, Dennis, Elian, Nicolas, Fletcher, Paul, Froum, Stuart, Magner, Ann, Cho, Sang‐Choon, Salama, Maurice, Salama, Henry, Garber, David A.·2003·Journal of Periodontology

Abstract

Background: As patient demand increases for more natural restorations in the esthetic zone, clinicians must have the highest level of skill and knowledge to maintain or reform the interdental papilla between teeth, between implants and teeth, and between adjacent implants. To date, there are no reports that have measured the distance from the contact point to the bony crest between implants. One reason for this may be the fact that, with two adjacent implants, the contact point of the crown can be established at any distance from the gingival margin according to the restorative dentist's specifications. Therefore, in this study, the height of the soft tissue to the crest of bone was measured between two adjacent implants independent of the location of the contact point. The purpose of this study was to determine the range and average height of tissue between two adjacent implants. Methods: A total of 136 interimplant papillary heights were examined in 33 patients by eight different examiners in five private dental offices. After administration of appropriate local anesthesia, a standardized periodontal probe was placed vertically from the height of the papilla to the crest of bone. The measurements were rounded off to the nearest millimeter. Results: The mean height of papillary tissue between two adjacent implants was 3.4 mm, with a range of 1 mm to 7 mm. Conclusions: Clinicians should proceed with great caution when placing two implants adjacent to each other in the esthetic zone. In most cases, only 2, 3, or 4 mm of soft tissue height (average 3.4 mm) can be expected to form over the interimplant crest of bone. These results showed that modification of treatment plans may be necessary when esthetics are critical for success. J Periodontol 2003;74:1785‐1788.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1902/jop.2003.74.12.1785

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 464

Metadata

Authors
Tarnow, D., Elian, N., Fletcher, P., Froum, S., Magner, A., Cho, S., Salama, M., Salama, H., & Garber, D. A.
Venue
Journal of Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-12
Volume
74
Issue
12
Pages
1785-1788
ISSN
  • 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3670
OpenAlex
W2136297473
Cited by
464
References
0
FWCI
12.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vertical Distance from the Crest of Bone to the Height of the Interproximal Papilla Between Adjacent Implants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1902/jop.2003.74.12.1785
The paper
Tarnow, D., Elian, N., Fletcher, P., Froum, S., Magner, A., Cho, S., Salama, M., Salama, H., & Garber, D. A. (2003). Vertical Distance from the Crest of Bone to the Height of the Interproximal Papilla Between Adjacent Implants. Journal of Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.12.1785

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.