Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Root Coverage Esthetic Score: A System to Evaluate the Esthetic Outcome of the Treatment of Gingival Recession Through Evaluation of Clinical Cases

Cairo, Francesco, Rotundo, Roberto, Miller, Preston D., Pini Prato, Giovan Paolo·2009·Journal of Periodontology

Abstract

Background: Generally, esthetic outcomes following root‐coverage procedures are not assessed. This article proposes a score for evaluating the esthetic outcome following root‐coverage surgery. Methods: Thirty‐one patients with Miller Class I and II recession defects treated with root‐coverage procedures were evaluated. Esthetic outcomes were assessed using the root coverage esthetic score (RES) 6 months after surgery. This score evaluates five variables: level of the gingival margin, marginal tissue contour, soft tissue texture, mucogingival junction alignment, and gingival color. Because complete root coverage was the primary treatment goal, and the other variables were considered secondary, the value assigned for root coverage was 60% of the total score, whereas 40% was assigned to the other four variables. With regard to assessment of the final position of the gingival margin, 3 points were given for partial root coverage, and 6 points were given for complete root coverage; 0 points were assigned when the final position of the gingival margin was equal or apical to the previous recession. One point was assigned for each of the other four variables. Thus, 10 points was a perfect score. Results: Of the 31 treated recession defects, 24 (77%) exhibited complete root coverage at 6 months. The mean amount of root coverage was 89.4% (range, 0% to 100%). The mean RES was 7.8. Five of 24 cases of complete root coverage achieved a perfect score (RES = 10). In one case, RES = 0. Conclusion: The RES system may be a useful tool to assess the esthetic outcome following root‐coverage procedures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1902/jop.2009.080565

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
Cairo, F., Rotundo, R., Miller, P. D., & Pini Prato, G. P.
Venue
Journal of Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
705-710
ISSN
  • 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-3670
OpenAlex
W1963632742
Cited by
281
References
6
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Root Coverage Esthetic Score: A System to Evaluate the Esthetic Outcome of the Treatment of Gingival Recession Through Evaluation of Clinical Cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1902/jop.2009.080565
The paper
Cairo, F., Rotundo, R., Miller, P. D., & Pini Prato, G. P. (2009). Root Coverage Esthetic Score: A System to Evaluate the Esthetic Outcome of the Treatment of Gingival Recession Through Evaluation of Clinical Cases. Journal of Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080565

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.