Effect of a Multidirectional Power Toothbrush and a Manual Toothbrush in Individuals Susceptible to Gingival Recession: A 12‐Month Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
Abstract
Background: Clinical studies have explored the relationship between toothbrushing and development of gingival recession (GR), but relevant GR data for the multidirectional power toothbrush (PT) are lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of brushing with either a multidirectional PT or American Dental Association reference manual toothbrush (MT) on mid‐buccal preexisting GR (PreGR) during 12 months. Methods: This was a 12‐month prospective, single‐masked, parallel‐group, randomized, controlled clinical study. Healthy participants without periodontitis with at least two teeth showing PreGR ≥2 mm were randomized to a group brushing with either an MT or PT. The primary outcome parameter was change at sites with PreGR ≥2 mm. All clinically based GR measurements were performed by one calibrated examiner at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were changes of GR at all mid‐buccal sites (with or without PreGR), changes in percentage of GR sites demonstrating a change of ≥1 mm, and changes in probing depths. Results: A total of 107 participants completed the study (PT: 55, MT: 52). During the 12‐month study period the mean recession at sites with PreGR ≥2 mm decreased significantly from 2.2 to 2.1 mm in both groups (P <0.05). The extent of GR parameters did not differ between MT and PT groups at any time point. GR evaluated clinically and on stone casts was well correlated. Conclusion: Neither the PT nor MT led to an increase in PreGR during 12 months of daily use.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In patients with pre-existing gingival recessions, there are no differences between manual and power toothbrush groups in further recession when evaluated for 1-3 years.
“Even in patients with pre-existing gingival recessions, which are more susceptible to the development of further recessions, there were no differences between manual and power toothbrush groups when evaluated for 1-3 years.108,109”
From Contemporary practices for mechanical oral hygiene to prevent periodontal disease. (2020) · cites this paper as [109]
In two long-term studies, a substantial amount of recessions showed a reduction after 1-3 years without any additional therapy.
“In two long-term studies, it was found that a substantial amount of recessions showed a reduction after 1-3 years without any additional therapy.108,109”
From Contemporary practices for mechanical oral hygiene to prevent periodontal disease. (2020) · cites this paper as [109]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Sälzer, S., Graetz, C., Plaumann, A., Heinevetter, N., Grender, J., Klukowska, M., Schneider, C. A., Springer, C., Van der Weijden, F. A., & Dörfer, C. E.
- Affiliations
- Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
- Procter & Gamble (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sälzer, Sonja
- Venue
- Journal of Periodontology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 548-556
- ISSN
- 0022-3492 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3670
- OpenAlex
- W2265827437
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Periodontology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental Erosion and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Keywords
- gingival recession, manual toothbrush, toothbrushing, probing depth, toothbrush design
- MeSH terms
- Dental Plaque, Dental Plaque Index, Equipment Design, Gingival Recession, Gingivitis, Humans, Periodontal Index, Prospective Studies, Toothbrushing, Single-Blind Method
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review