Cited by 6Second Language Learning and TeachingMultilingual Education and PolicyTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Developments In Stem Educators’ Preparedness For English Language Learners In The United States

Open access
Besterman, Keith R, Ernst, Jeremy, Williams, Thomas O.·2018·Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER)

Abstract

In the United States, the population of students classified as English Language Learners (ELLs) in K-12 education has increased in recent decades. As a result, teachers outside of specialized linguistic courses have needed to adapt their instruction to better meet the needs of these students. This exploratory study investigates potential indicators of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) teachers’ preparedness to work with ELLs, in comparison with the rates of ELLs in STEM courses. Data for this study were obtained from the national restricted-access datasets of the 2007-2008 and 2011-2012 School and Staffing Survey (SASS) Teacher Questionnaire (TQ). STEM teachers’ participation in ELL-focused professional development activities, credentialing related to ELLs, and ELL populations in STEM teachers’ courses were analyzed to quantify changes in these measures over time and among the STEM disciplines. Regional analysis of STEM teacher populations and ELL populations in STEM classes was also conducted to examine how these factors differed across the United States. Analyses of these data indicated increases in the percentage of STEM teachers who have ELLs in their service loads and in the average number of ELLs in teacher service loads; these trends were present in all U.S. regions and in all STEM disciplines. However, the total number of STEM teachers who participated in ELL-focused professional development activities increased only slightly over the four-year span. To effectively teach the growing ELL student population, STEM teachers must develop the skills and approaches necessary to educate and engage these students.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.19030/cier.v11i4.10211

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • STEM teachers have less access to professional development opportunities and instructional resources on CLR pedagogy than teachers of other subject areas.

    “Moreover, according to Besterman et al. (2018), STEM teachers have less access to professional development opportunities and instructional resources on CLR pedagogy than teachers of other subject areas.”

    From Unpacking Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Beliefs on Culturally and Linguistically Responsive Mathematics and Science Teaching for English Language Learners (2023) · cites this paper as Besterman et al. (2018)

    The Conclusions (page not provided) report that STEM teachers’ participation in ELL-focused professional development did not keep pace with growing ELL enrollment. The paper does not establish that STEM teachers had less access than teachers in other subjects, nor does it assess access to instructional resources or specifically address CLR pedagogy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. August, D., Shanahan, T., & Escamilla, K. (2009). English language learners: Developing literacy in second-language learners- report of the national literacy panel on language-minority children and youth. Journal of Literacy Research, 41(4), 432- 452. doi:10.1080/10862960903340165 · DOI
  2. Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships: What is STEM? School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x · DOI
  3. Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM education? [Editorial] Science, 329(5995), 996-996. doi:10.1126/science.1194998 · DOI
  4. Calderón, M., Slavin, R., & Sánchez, M. (2011). Effective Instruction for English Learners. The Future of Children, 21(1), 103- 127.
  5. Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach (2 nd ed.). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  6. Cheung, Alan C. K. & Slavin, R. E. (2012). Effective Reading Programs for Spanish-Dominant English Language Learners (ELLs) in the Elementary Grades: A synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 82(4), 351-395. doi:10.3102/0034654312465472 · DOI
  7. Daniel, S. M. (2014). Learning to Educate English Language Learners in Pre-Service Elementary Practicums. Teacher Education Quarterly, 41(2), 5. Retrieved from files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1078517.pdf
  8. Darling-Hammond, L. (1996) The Quiet Revolution Rethinking Teacher Development. Educational Leadership 53(6), 4-10.
  9. DelliCarpini, M. E., & Alonso, O. B. (2014). Teacher education that works: Preparing secondary-level math and science teachers for success with English language learners through content-based instruction. Global Education Review, 1(4), 155-178.
  10. DiCerbo, P. A., Anstrom, K. A., Baker, L. L., & Rivera, C. (2014). A Review of the Literature on Teaching Academic English to English Language Learners. Review of Educational Research, 84(3), 446-482. doi:10.3102/0034654314532695 · DOI
  11. Fillmore, L. W. (2014). English language learners at the crossroads of educational reform. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 624-632. doi:10.1002/tesq.174 · DOI
  12. García, E., Arias, M. B., Harris Murri, N. J., & Serna, C. (2010). Developing responsive teachers: A challenge for a demographic reality. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 132-142. doi:10.1177/0022487109347878 · DOI
  13. Honigsfeld, A., & Dunn, R. (2009). Learning-style responsive approaches for teaching typically performing and at-risk adolescents. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 82(5), 220. doi:10.3200/TCHS.82.5.220-224 · DOI
  14. Janzen, J. (2008). Teaching English language learners in the content areas. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1010-1038. doi: 10.3102/0034654308325580. · DOI
  15. Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning (1st ed.). Oxford; New York; Oxford University Press.
  16. Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 491-530. doi:10.3102/00346543075004491 · DOI
  17. Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223-233. doi:10.3102/0013189X13480524 · DOI
  18. Marrero, M. M., Gunning, A. E., & Germain-Williams, T. (2014). What is STEM education? [Editorial] Global Education Review, 1(4), 1-6.
  19. Molle, D. (2013). Facilitating professional development for teachers of english language learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(Jan), 197-207. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.10.002 · DOI
  20. Nadelson, L. S., Seifert, A., Moll, A. J., & Coats, B. (2012). i-STEM summer institute: An integrated approach to teacher professional development in STEM. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 13(2), 69-83.
  21. Pereira, N., & de Oliveira, L. C. (2015). Meeting the linguistic needs of high-potential English language learners: What teachers need to know. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47(4), 208-215. doi:10.1177/0040059915569362 · DOI
  22. Portes, A., & Böröcz, J. (1989). Contemporary immigration: Theoretical perspectives on its determinants and modes of incorporation. The International Migration Review, 23(3), 606-630.
  23. Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the Immigrant Second Generation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  24. Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2014). Immigrant America: A portrait (4th ed.). Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press. doi:10.1525/j.ctt7zw0nw · DOI
  25. Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
  26. Schwartz, S., Unger, J., Lorenzo-Blanco, E., Des Rosiers, S., Villamar, J., Soto, D., . . . Szapocznik, J. (2014). Perceived context of reception among recent Hispanic immigrants: Conceptualization, instrument development, and preliminary validation. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(1), 1-15. doi:10.1037/a0033391 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Besterman, K. R., Ernst, J., & Williams, T. O.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University (US)
Venue
Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER)
Published
2018-10-05
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
165-176
ISSN
  • 1940-5847 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-756X
OpenAlex
W2894945719
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
8.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
English language learners, STEM teachers, teacher readiness, teacher certification, K-12 education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review