The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 47 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The History Of Project Management
Open accessAbstract
Long before there was an institute for project management, or updated knowledge books and guides on how to manage projects, or even before the existence of Gantt charts, history offers several examples of colossal projects successfully completed. The Pyramids of Giza, Great Wall of China, and Coliseum are all good examples of such projects. Project Management, at its core, is concerned with creating an environment where people can work together to achieve a mutual objective, in order to deliver successful projects on time and on budget. Throughout the history of humanity, humans have been working on improving and refining the practices of project management. The goal of this paper is to present the evolution of project management since ancient times until present times and its outlook in the future by outlining major events and developments throughout history.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
58 No basis given · 45 Sources not found · 19 Own interpretation · 1 No full text of the sources · 1 Not checked yet
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Those architects and engineers were serving their primary roles of engineers and architects as well as project managers.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN ANCIENT HISTORY
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The Project Management Institute's definition of a project and project management can be applied to ancient historical undertakings.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He is best known for The Clute Institute developing the Gantt chart.”
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Through the Polaris project, the U.S. navy is credited for developing one of today's most widely used technique is Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT).”
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The efficiency of PCs allowed for developing software capable of handling and organizing complex data required to manage projects.”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In 1986, Scrum, an agile software development model encouraging software development by multiple small teams was developed.”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Nonaka, 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In the third era, 1980 to 1994, multitasking Personal Computers (PC) made an impact on many aspects of work and business including project management.”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although somewhat overlapping, CPM/PERT have been developed along two parallel lines in two very different fields: the navy and the chemical industry.”
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The Manhattan Project”
§ The History Of Project Management > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Shenhar A., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 1958, the U.S. navy led the Polaris project, the first submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBM) carrying nuclear warheads.”
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“in 2003 Kwak identified four periods in the history of modern project: prior to 1958, 1958 -1979, 1980 -1994, and 1995 to present (Y.H. KWAK, 2003).”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FOUR PERIODS OF MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
- Probably not a substantial claim. 90
- It may state two separate claims as one. 35
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“During the 1960s ambitious projects such as landing a man in the moon further helped in the formation and utilization of tools to manage large scope projects.”
§ The History Of Project Management > INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fayol's five functions of management are: planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling.”
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were also other noteworthy projects, such as the Manhattan project, that significantly contributed to advancement of standard practices in modern project management.”
§ The History Of Project Management > INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the 1970s technological advancement made the creation of project management software possible, via software companies such as Oracle.”
§ The History Of Project Management > INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Throughout history, ingenious architects and engineers have delivered impressive projects such as the great Pyramid of Giza, The Great Wall of China, the Coliseum, the hanging gardens of Babylon and the Stonehenge to name a few.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN ANCIENT HISTORY
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“roject management has been practiced for as long as humanity inhabited earth.”
§ The History Of Project Management > INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The Project Management Institute's definition of a project and project management can be applied to ancient historical undertakings.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In order for these projects to succeed, these engineers turned into project managers, had to carefully think about all the processes of the project starting with the initiation and planning phases to execution and monitoring all the way to closing of the”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN ANCIENT HISTORY
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many of these projects necessitated an enormous workforce, large scope, many years of work, advanced planning and precise execution.”
§ The History Of Project Management > INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are many examples in history of challenging projects that were successfully completed, despite all the complexities and uncertainties that could've rendered the project a failure.”
§ The History Of Project Management > INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the 1990s notable project management tools such as PRINCE2 and CCPM commenced.”
§ The History Of Project Management > INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Y. C. Chiu, proclaims that both Henri Foyal and Henry Gantt are the forefathers of Project Management (Chiu Y. , 2010).”
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Chiu Y. , 2010
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It's not until the 1950s that organizations have started to apply systematic tools and techniques to complex projects.”
§ The History Of Project Management > INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Very little documentation of the methods and techniques used in historical projects exists before the 1950s.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the 1980s PCs became affordable, subsequently smaller companies started to use computers for project management.”
§ The History Of Project Management > INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There seems to be no agreement on when exactly modern project management actually started.”
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, project management theories, tools, and techniques are now mainstream in many organizations and industries.”
§ The History Of Project Management > INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the third millennium, academia started offering degrees for project management.”
§ The History Of Project Management > INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The U.S. Navy greatly contributed to the formulation and documentation of principles of modern project management methodologies and techniques.”
§ The History Of Project Management > INTRODUCTION
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gantt charts are significant in the history of modern project management, because they recognize the benefits of breaking large projects into smaller manageable tasks.They also account for the fact that some tasks may depend on each other.”
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, Fayol's work made significant contributions to management.”
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fayol also formulated 14 principles which give guidance to managers on how to execute those five managerial functions effectively.”
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Gantt Charts were first used in Hoover Dam and then in the Interstate Highway projects.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FOUR PERIODS OF MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The philosophy is aimed at helping organizations continually achieve their goals using the premise that the rate of goal achievement by a goal-oriented system is limited by at least one constraint (Cox & Goldratt, 1986) .”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Cox & Goldratt, 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Another significant development during that time was the Theory of Constraints (TOC), which is a management philosophy introduced by Eliyahu M. Goldratt in his well-known Novel”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Cox & Goldratt, 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The field of project management continues to evolve.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Important projects from that period are Hoover Dam, Interstate Highway and Manhattan project.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FOUR PERIODS OF MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In its third edition of the PMBok®, PMI adopted the PDMA method in 1996 right after AACE's publication of the concept (Hollman, 2006).”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hollman, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A significant advancement to the field is the development of the Total Cost Management (TCM) method.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Kwak asserts that the origins of modern project management started between 1900s and 1950s.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FOUR PERIODS OF MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Polaris and Apollo are considered significant projects from that period.”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gantt charts are still in use today and are considered a vital tool in a project manager's toolkit.”
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It was also during that time that core project management tools such as PERT and CPM commenced.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FOUR PERIODS OF MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 1987, PMBOK® was published by PMI, the book was mostly based on a white paper called published in 1983 called the”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this era technology continues to be a driving force for change, and greatly impacts what project managers do.”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Unfortunately for Adamieckic, he only published his articles in Polish and Russian and, hence, his invention was not widely recognized or adopted in the west (Marsh, 1975).”
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Marsh, 1975
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Four years later, the Project Management Institute (PMI), which is primarily based in the U.S.A, was founded.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FOUR PERIODS OF MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The PDMA model uses an iterative approach to arriving at clearly defined repeatable processes.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Science magazine, the publication of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, observed”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Wolfe, 1968
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Finally, The Calgary Winter Olympic game in 1988 was an example of successful event management (Y.H. KWAK, 2003).”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Kwak presents three projects from the third era that illustrated the application of high technology and the project management tools and practices of the time.The featured projects are The English-France Channel project (1989)(1990)(1991), Space Shuttle Challenger project (1983)(1984)(1985)(1986), and The XV Calgary Olympic Winter Games (1988).”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the west, Henry Gantt designed his charts around 1910 -1015, and the charts were later used in large projects in World War I and the construction of Hoover Dam, which contributed to their adoption and wide use.”
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the scope of a project, TCM is a set of practices and processes an organization applies to govern the cost in the life cycle of a project.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 1994 the Standish Group published the CHAOS report, which is a collection of information on real project failures in Information Technology (IT).”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In the 1970s, computers progressed from mainframe to mini-computers which made computers more affordable.”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Azzopardi, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Scrum's approach is a flexible, holistic product development strategy where a development team works as a unit to reach a common goal”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Nonaka, 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The guide was an attempt to document and standardize accepted project management and practices.”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Since its development in 1965 IPMA has grown substantially and is now prime international promoter of project management in Europe, Asia, and Arab countries.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FOUR PERIODS OF MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The PMBOK® guide has become the global standard for the industry.”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The Manhattan project on the other hand, was particularly important because many still consider it the beginning of modern project management.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FOUR PERIODS OF MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“TCM as defined by the AACE International (formerly Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering) is a”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites AACE International
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The TCM approach is based on the Plan Do Check Access (PDMA).”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The project goal, cost, schedule, and other factors needed to be adjusted to conduct the project.The language, use of standard metrics, and other communication differences needed to be coordinated”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Apollo was NASA's first formal system of project management in response to the need for standards in managing the complex, expensive and ambitious plan to land a man on the moon.”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the charts bear Gantt's name, it's arguable that Gantt charts were actually developed much earlier by a Polish economist named Karol Adamieckic.”
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In the 1980s project management programs were mostly based on the Projects Resource Organization Management Planning Technique II (PROMPT II) model of project management, which was later refined into the PRojects In Controlled Environments (PRINCE) model (Bizness Académie, 2012).”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bizness Académie, 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With ongoing standardization of processes, refinement of concepts, and development of software and applications, project management is becoming more of a science than art.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 1996 PRINCE was upgraded to PRINCE2, and soon after in 1997 an alternative method called the Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) was introduced.”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Another important development during that time was also mandating the use of Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) approach for any future projects bearing the size and scope of Polaris.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FOUR PERIODS OF MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 2001 The Agile Manifesto was written.”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“PMI is widely known as the publisher of The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK).”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FOUR PERIODS OF MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Y.H. KWAK, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The objective of the group is making the industry more successful by profiling projects and environments against the collected cases and delivers advices based on collective wisdom.”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 1998 both The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) recognized PMBOK® as a standard.”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“CCPM is a method of planning and managing projects developed by Eliyahu M. Goldratt.It is derived from TOC, and unlike CPM and PERT the method mainly emphasized resources required to complete the project rather than the specific tasks (Goldratt, 1997).”
§ The History Of Project Management > The Clute Institute
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Goldratt, 1997
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The book is a compilation of processes and knowledge areas generally accepted as best practice within the project management discipline (ITRM Guideline CPM 110-01, 2006).”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FOUR PERIODS OF MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites ITRM Guideline CPM 110-01, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The software is hosted remotely and delivery is made possible through the cloud.Cloud providers are responsible for handling the infrastructure that supports the software (Armando Fox, 2014).”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Armando Fox, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, project managers will also have to adapt to shifting organizational structure.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FUTURE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The one certain thing in the future is that in order to succeed, project managers of the twenty-first century have to be adaptable to constant change, uncertainty and disruptions.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FUTURE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, while the future may require future project managers to adapt by learning new specialized skills, the fundamental elements that make a project manager a great one will not change; leadership, pragmatism, decisiveness, communication and foresight to name a few.”
§ The History Of Project Management > CONCLUSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As there was no consensus on the beginnings of project management, there also is no consensus on the future of project management.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FUTURE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The idea behind SaaS is that organizations can have access to a software for a fee, usually pay per use or monthly fee that end up being less than the licensing fees, without worrying about the hassle of installation, maintenance or hardware requirements.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Advancements in science and technology expedited the progression of project management as a profession.”
§ The History Of Project Management > CONCLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is now widely accepted that a project manager requires a special set of skills.”
§ The History Of Project Management > CONCLUSION
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the same year, PRINCE2 was refreshed.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This business model is touted as the future of application usage.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“On the other hand, as more businesses adopt a more collaborative virtual workspace, challenges in aspects such as leadership, trust, control, and communication are amplified, with communication being the top challenge (Osman, 2011).”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Osman, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The retirement of baby boomers, will make it harder for employers to find talent for vacant positions, which will give talented employees more bargaining power.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FUTURE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“According to U.S. news, in 2010, 3.4 million people, equivalent to 9.4% of U.S. workers, worked from home at least one day a week, compared with 9.2 million people, or 7% of U.S. workers in 1997 (Shah, 2013).”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Shah, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“in 2009”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Project Managment Institute, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studying the history of project management, one will understand that project management has evolved throughout history.”
§ The History Of Project Management > CONCLUSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With large complex projects, it's becoming a necessity for the project manager to coordinate multidisciplinary knowledge, and to effectively accomplish the undertaking, project managers will have to adapt to new technologies and learn which specialized intricate tools will work best for each project.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FUTURE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subsequently, SaaS became synonymous with Storage as a Service.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Project managers will also have to acclimate to the changing demographics of the workforce, such as the retirement of baby boomers, immigration flow change, and the number of young professionals entering the workforce.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FUTURE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first guide is Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2, which is a guide intended for people managing projects on daily basis.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The assessment in the report is that”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FUTURE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Project Management Institute, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Another challenge for project managers will be cutting through the ceaseless sea of information by filtering abundant data and capturing the right information.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FUTURE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The phenomenon of the virtual worker has become mainstream, and chances are it's not going anywhere soon.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The space is often used for backup, and it offers a good option for small to mid-sized companies that may lack resources such as personnel, hardware and physical space for a reliable backup service.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The demand is increasing for project management as a core competency in various fields such as Information Technology, engineering, business, health care, education, construction and manufacturing.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The challenge for future project managers will be understanding the big picture and effectively communicating with others.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FUTURE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Its continuous evolvement facilitated the advancement of project management, and hence paved the way for the next big project.”
§ The History Of Project Management > CONCLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Storage as a Service is a similar model to Software as a Service, where large businesses can rent storage space from their infrastructure to others.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Communications technology is now ubiquitous and affordable, which is makes it increasingly easier to work from home or other places.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Globalization, limited resources, stakeholders, competition, economics and many other factors are contributing to the transformation of organizations and business environment (Construction Industry Institue, 2014).”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FUTURE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Construction Industry Institue, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As organizations evolve, so will the challenges facing future project managers.”
§ The History Of Project Management > CONCLUSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 2008 a fourth edition of the PMBok® was published.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Having to work across-networks, with people in different countries, and people who come from different cultures will only compound the complexity of effective communication for future project managers.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FUTURE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within the same year Software as a Service (SaaS) became ubiquitous.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As the dynamics and environment of organizations evolve, the challenges of future project managers will follow suit.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FUTURE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Academe responded by offering several programs and degrees in project management designed to prepare prospective project managers with the knowledge and tools that can allow them to succeed in all phases of project management.”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Depending on the article or source you read, there are conflicting predictions when it The Clute Institute comes to the future of project management as a profession.”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FUTURE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The second guide is called Directing Successful Projects with PRINCE2, which is a guide designed for directors or sponsors of projects (Office of Goverment Commerce, 2009).”
§ The History Of Project Management > PROJECT MANAGEMENT POST THE FOURTH PERIODS
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Office of Goverment Commerce, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Consequently, there will be a high global demand for project managers, which makes the project management profession very desirable (Project Management Institute, 2013).”
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FUTURE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Project Management Institute, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper relies on this without support.
Very little documentation of the methods and techniques used in historical projects exists before the 1950s.
“Regrettably, despite all of these monumental achievements, very little documentation of their methods and techniques exists.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The Project Management Institute's definition of a project and project management can be applied to ancient historical undertakings.
“If we agree with the definition offered by Project Management Institute that a project is”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
“In 1986 Karol Adamieckic invented what was then a novel method to visualize interdependent processes.”
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
“Although the charts bear Gantt's name, it's arguable that Gantt charts were actually developed much earlier by a Polish economist named Karol Adamieckic.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The History Of Project Management > THE FOUR PERIODS OF MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
“Gantt Charts were first used in Hoover Dam and then in the Interstate Highway projects.”
§ The History Of Project Management > MODERN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: WHEN DID IT ACTUALLY START?
“the charts were later used in large projects in World War I and the construction of Hoover Dam”
Citations
Cites
A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide)
Pmbok (2004) · Cited by 4,316
The new new product development game
(1986) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1016/0737-6782(86)90053-6 · Cited by 1,614
The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement
Goldratt, E. M., & Cox, J. (1984) · International Linear Collider · Cited by 1,155
The American Association for the Advancement of Science
Haultain, A. (1889) · Nature · doi:10.1038/040556a0 · Cited by 944
The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement
(2005) · Measuring Business Excellence · doi:10.1108/13683040510588882 · Cited by 482
A Brief History of Project Management
Morris, P. W. G. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199563142.003.0002 · Cited by 158
Reinventing project management, by Aaron Shenhar a Dov Dvir
Söderlund, J. (2008) · R and D Management · Cited by 95
Reinventing Project Management
Haberstroh, M. (2010) · PROJEKTMANAGEMENT AKTUELL · Cited by 89
Fells, M. J. (2000) · Journal of Management History (Archive) · doi:10.1108/13552520010359379 · Cited by 72
The Evolution of Project Management
Cleland, D. I. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2004.836362 · Cited by 50
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [9]9. Goldratt, E. (1997). Critical Chain. Great Barrington: North River Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Davies, A. C., Manning, S. D., & Söderlund, J. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.002 · Cited by 155
Towards a ‘New Project Management’ movement? An international development perspective
Picciotto, R. (2019) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.08.002 · Cited by 97
Foundations of Project Management Research: An Explicit and Six-Facet Ontological Framework
Gauthier, J., & Ika, L. A. (2012) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1002/pmj.21288 · Cited by 88
Digital intelligence: A must-have for project managers
Marnewick, C., & Marnewick, A. L. (2021) · Project Leadership and Society · doi:10.1016/j.plas.2021.100026 · Cited by 107
The Demands of Industry 4.0 on Project Teams
Marnewick, C., & Marnewick, A. L. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2019.2899350 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Seymour, T., & Hussein, S.
- Affiliations
- Minot State University (US)
- ORCID
- Hussein, Sara
- Venue
- International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS)
- Publisher
- Clute Institute
- Published
- 2014-09-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 233
- ISSN
- 1546-5748 (ISSN-L)
- 2157-9628
- OpenAlex
- W2127765879
- Semantic Scholar
- 995eacd0bf44ad2bffc7d94a5518197e5ae884ea
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 10.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Economic and Technological Systems Analysis
- Keywords
- Gantt chart, project delivery, future of project management, Giza pyramids, Great Wall of China, Colosseum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-30, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-30 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The History Of Project Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.19030/ijmis.v18i4.8820
- The paper
- Seymour, T., & Hussein, S. (2014). The History Of Project Management. International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS). https://doi.org/10.19030/ijmis.v18i4.8820
