Facial Expression Recognition: A Survey of Techniques, Datasets, and Real-World Challenges
Open accessAbstract
Facial expressions are a powerful nonverbal communication tool that can convey emotions, thoughts, and intentions, enhancing the richness and effectiveness of human interaction. Facial Expression Recognition (FER) has gained increasing attention due to its applications in education, healthcare, marketing, and security. In this survey, we examine the key techniques and approaches employed in FER, focusing on three main categories: traditional machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid methods. We review traditional pipelines involving image preprocessing, feature extraction, and classification, along with deep learning methods such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), transfer learning, attention mechanisms, and optimized loss functions. Furthermore, the study provides a comprehensive examination of existing research and available datasets related to emotion recognition. We also summarize the best-performing methods used with the most common datasets. In addition, the survey addresses the technical challenges of emotion recognition in real-world scenarios, such as variations in illumination, occlusion, and population diversity. The survey highlights state-of-the-art FER models, comparing their accuracy, efficiency, and limitations. Ultimately, this work serves as a comprehensive starting point for researchers, offering insights into current FER trends and guiding the development of more robust and accurate recognition systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
PAtt-Lite: Lightweight Patch and Attention MobileNet for Challenging Facial Expression Recognition
Ngwe, J. L., Lim, K. M., Lee, C. P., Ong, T. S., & Alqahtani, A. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3407108 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Abdeldayem, M., Hamed, H. F. A., & Nagy, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Egyptian Russian University (EG)
- Benha University (EG)
- Venue
- Statistics, Optimization & Information Computing
- Publisher
- International Academic Press
- Published
- 2025-10-23
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 733-761
- ISSN
- 2310-5070 (ISSN-L)
- 2311-004X
- OpenAlex
- W7111149304
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Statistics Optimization & Information Computing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
- Keywords
- facial expression recognition, emotion recognition, facial expression datasets, convolutional neural networks, transfer learning, attention mechanism, loss functions, image preprocessing, feature extraction, occlusion, illumination variation, population diversity, nonverbal communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review