Cited by 4Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace recognition and analysisFace and Expression Recognition

Facial Expression Recognition: A Survey of Techniques, Datasets, and Real-World Challenges

Open access
Abdeldayem, Mohamed, Hamed, Hesham F. A., Nagy, Amr M.·2025·Statistics, Optimization & Information Computing

Abstract

Facial expressions are a powerful nonverbal communication tool that can convey emotions, thoughts, and intentions, enhancing the richness and effectiveness of human interaction. Facial Expression Recognition (FER) has gained increasing attention due to its applications in education, healthcare, marketing, and security. In this survey, we examine the key techniques and approaches employed in FER, focusing on three main categories: traditional machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid methods. We review traditional pipelines involving image preprocessing, feature extraction, and classification, along with deep learning methods such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), transfer learning, attention mechanisms, and optimized loss functions. Furthermore, the study provides a comprehensive examination of existing research and available datasets related to emotion recognition. We also summarize the best-performing methods used with the most common datasets. In addition, the survey addresses the technical challenges of emotion recognition in real-world scenarios, such as variations in illumination, occlusion, and population diversity. The survey highlights state-of-the-art FER models, comparing their accuracy, efficiency, and limitations. Ultimately, this work serves as a comprehensive starting point for researchers, offering insights into current FER trends and guiding the development of more robust and accurate recognition systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.19139/soic-2310-5070-2789

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Abdeldayem, M., Hamed, H. F. A., & Nagy, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Egyptian Russian University (EG)
  • Benha University (EG)
Venue
Statistics, Optimization & Information Computing
Published
2025-10-23
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
733-761
ISSN
  • 2310-5070 (ISSN-L)
  • 2311-004X
OpenAlex
W7111149304
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Statistics Optimization & Information Computing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
facial expression recognition, emotion recognition, facial expression datasets, convolutional neural networks, transfer learning, attention mechanism, loss functions, image preprocessing, feature extraction, occlusion, illumination variation, population diversity, nonverbal communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review