Cited by 633Online and Blended LearningTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesEducational Technology in Learning

Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning

Open access
McBrien, J. Lynn, Cheng, Rui, Jones, Phyllis·2009·The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning

Abstract

This research study is a collaborative project between faculty in social foundations, special education, and instructional technology in which we analyze student data from six undergraduate and graduate courses related to the use of a virtual classroom space. Transactional distance theory (Moore & Kearsley, 1996) operates as our theoretical framework as we explore the role of a virtual classroom in distance education and analyze the ways in which a synchronous learning environment affects students’ learning experiences. Elluminate Live! was the software employed in the virtual classroom. In this analysis, particular themes emerged related to dialogue, structure, and learner autonomy. In addition, students rated convenience, technical issues, and pedagogical preferences as important elements in their learning experiences. The article discusses these themes as a contribution to reducing the “distance” that students experience in online learning and to developing quality distance education experiences for students in higher education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.605

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Battin-Little, B., Passmore, D., & Schullo, S. (2006, November/December). Using synchronous software in Web-based nursing courses. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 24(6), 317-325.
  2. Belz, J. A., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2003). Teachers as intercultural learners: Negotiating German-American telecollaboration along the institutional fault line. Modern Language Journal, 87, 71-89.
  3. Butner, B.K., Smith, A. B., & Murray, J. (1999). Distance technology: A national study of graduate higher education programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2(3). Retrieved May 2, 2007, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall23/butner23.html
  4. Chen, Y., and Willits, F. K. (1999). Dimensions of educational transactions in a videoconferencing learning environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 13, 45-59.
  5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2001). Research methods in education. London: Routledge Falmer.
  6. Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005). A critical analysis of transactional distance theory. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 1-11.
  7. Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods in education. London: Sage Publications.
  8. Jones, P., West, E., & Stevens, D. (2006) -I realized I knew nothing, that I had an awful lot to learn, and that I would have to help others see teachers in a different light‖: An international perspective on effective moments of teacher learning. British Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 82-90.
  9. Jung, I. (2001). Building a theoretical framework of Web-based instruction in the context of distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 525-34.
  10. Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. New York: Routledge.
  11. West, E., & Jones, P., (2007). A framework for planning technology used in teacher education programs that serve rural communities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 26(4), 3-15.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McBrien, J. L., Cheng, R., & Jones, P.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Nazareth College (US)
Venue
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
Published
2009-06-26
Volume
10
Issue
3
ISSN
1492-3831 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152490358
Cited by
633
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 122 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 22
FWCI
65.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
synchronous online learning, virtual learning environments, student engagement, transactional distance theory, distance education, learner autonomy, Elluminate Live!, student learning experience, technical issues in online learning, special education course, instructional technology course

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review