The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the CCK08 Course Tools
Open accessAbstract
In 2008, a new term emerged in the already crowded e-learning landscape: MOOC, or massive open online course. Lifelong learners can now use various tools to build and manage their own learning networks, and MOOCs may provide opportunities to test such networks. This paper focuses on the technological aspects of one MOOC, the Connectivism and Connective Knowledge (CCK08) course, in order to investigate lifelong learners’ attitudes towards learning network technologies. The research framework is represented by three perspectives: (a) lifelong learning in relation to open education, with a focus on the effective use of learning tools; (b) the more recent personal knowledge management (PKM) skills approach; and (c) the usability of web-based learning tools. Findings from a survey of CCK08 participants show that the course attracted mainly adult, informal learners, who were unconcerned about course completion and who cited a lack of time as the main reason for incompletion. Time constraints, language barriers, and ICT skills affected the participants’ choice of tools; for example, learners favoured the passive, filtered mailing list over interactive but time-consuming discussion forums and blogs. Some recommendations for future MOOCs include highlighting the pedagogical purpose of the tools offered (e.g., learning network skill-building) and stating clearly that the learners can choose which tools they prefer to use. Further research on sustainability and instructor workload issues should be conducted to determine the cost and effectiveness of MOOCs. Investigation is also necessary to understand whether such terms as course, drop-out, and attrition are appropriate in relation to MOOCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New Technology Supporting Informal Learning
Downes, S. (2010) · Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence · doi:10.4304/jetwi.2.1.27-33 · Cited by 265
Cited by
Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)
Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005 · Cited by 769
MOOCs and the funnel of participation
Clow, D. (2013) · Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge · doi:10.1145/2460296.2460332 · Cited by 567
Khan, I. U., Hameed, Z., Yu, Y., Islam, T., Sheikh, Z., & Khan, S. U. (2018) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.009 · Cited by 282
Developing graduate attributes in an open online course
Rowe, M. (2016) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12484 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Fini, A.
- Venue
- The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
- Publisher
- Athabasca University Press
- Published
- 2009-11-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1492-3831 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1765817687
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the CCK08 Course Tools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.19173/irrodl.v10i5.643
- The paper
- Fini, A. (2009). The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the CCK08 Course Tools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i5.643
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.