Big(ger) data as better data in open distance learning
Open accessAbstract
In the context of the hype, promise and perils of Big Data and the currently dominant paradigm of data-driven decision-making, it is important to critically engage with the potential of Big Data for higher education. We do not question the potential of Big Data, but we do raise a number of issues, and present a number of theses to be seriously considered in realising this potential. The University of South Africa (Unisa) is one of the mega ODL institutions in the world with more than 360,000 students and a range of courses and programmes. Unisa already has access to a staggering amount of student data, hosted in disparate sources, and governed by different processes. As the university moves to mainstreaming online learning, the amount of and need for analyses of data are increasing, raising important questions regarding our assumptions, understanding, data sources, systems and processes. This article presents a descriptive case study of the current state of student data at Unisa, as well as explores the impact of existing data sources and analytic approaches. From the analysis it is clear that in order for big(ger) data to be better data, a number of issues need to be addressed. The article concludes by presenting a number of theses that should form the basis for the imperative to optimise the harvesting, analysis and use of student data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Student data has always been used to inform policy, admission requirements, pedagogy, and resource allocation.
“In the context of higher education institutions (HEIs), student data (in a variety of formats) has always been used to inform policy, admission requirements, pedagogy, and resource allocation (Prinsloo & Slade, 2014;Prinsloo, Archer, Barnes, Chetty, & Van Zyl, 2015).”
From Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics: An Exploration (2016) · cites this paper as Prinsloo, Archer, Barnes, Chetty, & Van Zyl, 2015
Cites
The rise of Big Data: what does it mean for education, technology, and media research?
Eynon, R. (2013) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2013.771783 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Big data and data science: a critical review of issues for educational research.
Daniel, B. K. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12595 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics: An Exploration
Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2016) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2016.31.10 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
“The danger of contextual integrity collapse increases when algorithms collect data, often from a range of institutional repositories (Prinsloo et al., 2015).”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Prinsloo, P., Archer, E., Barnes, G., Chetty, Y., & Van Zyl, D.
- Affiliations
- University of South Africa (ZA)
- Venue
- The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
- Publisher
- Athabasca University Press
- Published
- 2015-02-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1492-3831 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1549254143
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 14.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
- Keywords
- big data, open and distance learning, student data, data-driven decision making, higher education, University of South Africa, online learning, data governance, data analytics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review