Cited by 66Online Learning and AnalyticsBig Data Technologies and ApplicationsBig Data and Business Intelligence

Big(ger) data as better data in open distance learning

Open access
Prinsloo, Paul, Archer, Elizabeth, Barnes, Glen, Chetty, Yuraisha, Van Zyl, Dion·2015·The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning

Abstract

In the context of the hype, promise and perils of Big Data and the currently dominant paradigm of data-driven decision-making, it is important to critically engage with the potential of Big Data for higher education. We do not question the potential of Big Data, but we do raise a number of issues, and present a number of theses to be seriously considered in realising this potential. The University of South Africa (Unisa) is one of the mega ODL institutions in the world with more than 360,000 students and a range of courses and programmes. Unisa already has access to a staggering amount of student data, hosted in disparate sources, and governed by different processes. As the university moves to mainstreaming online learning, the amount of and need for analyses of data are increasing, raising important questions regarding our assumptions, understanding, data sources, systems and processes. This article presents a descriptive case study of the current state of student data at Unisa, as well as explores the impact of existing data sources and analytic approaches. From the analysis it is clear that in order for big(ger) data to be better data, a number of issues need to be addressed. The article concludes by presenting a number of theses that should form the basis for the imperative to optimise the harvesting, analysis and use of student data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1948

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Student data has always been used to inform policy, admission requirements, pedagogy, and resource allocation.

    “In the context of higher education institutions (HEIs), student data (in a variety of formats) has always been used to inform policy, admission requirements, pedagogy, and resource allocation (Prinsloo & Slade, 2014;Prinsloo, Archer, Barnes, Chetty, & Van Zyl, 2015).”

    From Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics: An Exploration (2016) · cites this paper as Prinsloo, Archer, Barnes, Chetty, & Van Zyl, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prinsloo, P., Archer, E., Barnes, G., Chetty, Y., & Van Zyl, D.
Affiliations
University of South Africa (ZA)
Venue
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
Published
2015-02-12
Volume
16
Issue
1
ISSN
1492-3831 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1549254143
Cited by
66
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 2
FWCI
14.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
Keywords
big data, open and distance learning, student data, data-driven decision making, higher education, University of South Africa, online learning, data governance, data analytics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review