PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SPRINKLER IRRIGATION AT ARJO DEDESSA SUGAR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, OROMIA REGION
Open accessAbstract
The success of sprinkler irrigation system depends on its actual performance at field condition. Evaluation of the actual field performance of sprinkler irrigation is very important. This study was intended to evaluate the irrigation practice and the infield water application of Arjo Dedessa irrigation scheme by measuring the performance indicators of the irrigation as it is normally practiced. During the study, 12 field experiments were conducted in the period of December–February 2014/15 at two irrigation command area, to check uniformity of water application. The soil physical characteristics and the gravimetric water content were determined in the laboratory. To estimate the crop water requirement (CWR) and irrigation water requirement (IWR), the Crowpat 8 for windows was used. For the assessment of the systems performance, uniformity coefficient (CU), distribution uniformity (DU), adequacy of irrigation (AD), application efficiency (Ea),) evaporation and wind drift losses (EWD) were determined for 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 and 5.0 bar of hydrant pressure. The result shows the mean application rates for 18m x18m sprinkler spacing were 4.95mm/hr and the average soil infiltration rates 61mm/hr. The CU obtained were 74%, 80%, 85%, and 88% at the respective hydrant pressure of 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 and 5.0bar. Also distribution uniformity (DU values obtained from catch can tests data are 62%, 70%, 76% and 81%at respective hydrant pressure. The values of the system CU and system DU are very close…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Flow and sprinkler irrigation are commonly practiced in the Arjo-Didessa plantation.
“Flow and sprinkler irrigation are commonly practiced in the plantation (Fikadu, 2015).”
From Investigating the Impact of Irrigation on Malaria Vector Larval Habitats and Transmission Using a Hydrology‐Based Model (2023) · cites this paper as Fikadu, 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jiang, A., Lee, M., Selvaraj, P., Degefa, T., Getachew, H., Merga, H., Yewhalaw, D., Yan, G., & Hsu, K. (2023) · GeoHealth · doi:10.1029/2023gh000868 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- FIKADU, A.
- Corresponding author
- ABERA FIKADU
- Venue
- National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia
- Publisher
- National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia
- Published
- 2015-05-01
- OpenAlex
- W6963357087
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- National Academic Digital Repository of Ethiopia (other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Engineering and Agricultural Innovations
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
- Keywords
- sprinkler irrigation, irrigation system performance evaluation, water application uniformity, distribution uniformity, application efficiency, crop water requirements, irrigation water demand, soil infiltration rate, Oromia, sprinkler spacing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review