Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 382

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Journal of Science and Technology

Open access
·2016·Journal of Science and Technology

Abstract

Sugar cane bagasse was pretreated by steam explosion for the simultaneous production of furfural and α-cellulose pulp.The components of bagasse were fractionated after steam explosion.The details of the process are as follows.Bagasse was soaked in water for one night and steamed at temperatures varying between 206 and 223 °C for 4 minutes.The steam exploded pulp was strained and washed with hot water to yield a liquor rich in hemicellulose-derived mono-and oligosaccharides.The remaining pulp was delignified by alkali for 120 minutes at 170°C using, separately, NaOH load of 15, 20 and 25% of weight of the pulp.The delignified pulp was further bleached twice with 4% H 2 O 2 charge of weight of the pulp to produce high α-cellulose pulp.The water liquor was evaporated and further hydrolysed and dehydrated with diluted H 2 SO 4 in a stainless steel reactor to produce furfural.The result shows that the optimal pretreatment of steam explosion for 4 min at 218°C leads to the yield of α-cellulose pulp at 193-201 g•kg -1 of the original bagasse, and that furfural can be produced from xylose present in the liquor with a maximum conversion factor of 0.16.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20428/jst

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 382

Metadata

Venue
Journal of Science and Technology
Published
2016-04-18
ISSN
  • 1607-2073 (ISSN-L)
  • 2410-5163
OpenAlex
W4214562291
Cited by
382
References
4
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.