The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sarcoptic mange in wildlife: -EN- -FR- -ES-
Open accessAbstract
Sarcoptic manage caused by Sarcoptes scabiei is responsible for epizootic disease in populations of wild canids in North America, Europe and Australia, wild cats in Europe and Africa, wild ungulates and wild boars in Europe, wombats and koalas in Australia, and great apes and various wild bovids in Africa. Although short-term mortality may appear devastating, in a self-sustaining population, mortality is non-compensatory and a mange epizootic generally does not affect long-term population dynamics. Alternatively, the net effect of a mange epizootic can have serious consequences in remnant or fragmented populations of CITES-listed, threatened, or endangered species where loss of even a few individuals can be critical to the survival or restoration of a species (CITES: Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora). The pathogenesis and concordant clinical symptoms of mange depends on the immune status of the respective host. Naïve, immunocompromised or anergic animals that are unable to evoke hypersensitivity responses develop an extensive epidermal hyperkeratosis usually without marked alopecia, but with an underlying chronic dermal inflammation and an abundance of mites in the skin. Immunocompetent hosts are able to develop strong types I and IV hypersensitivity responses that result in a marked decrease and eventual loss of mites in the skin. However, there are dramatic structural and functional changes in the skin; it becomes extensively thickened, greyish in colour and there is a marked eosinophilia throughout the epidermis and dermis. There is often almost complete alopecia. Isolation and treatment of infected individuals may be warranted, and has met with some success in small remaining populations of certain highly endangered species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Problems in Diagnosing Scabies, a Global Disease in Human and Animal Populations
Walton, S. F., & Currie, B. J. (2007) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00042-06 · Cited by 423
Scabies: more than just an irritation
McCarthy, J. S., Kemp, D. J., Walton, S. F., & Currie, B. J. (2004) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.2003.014563 · Cited by 256
Pisano, S. R. R., Zimmermann, F., Rossi, L., Capt, S., Akdesir, E., Bürki, R., Kunz, F., Origgi, F. C., & Ryser-Degiorgis, M.-P. (2019) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-019-3762-7 · Cited by 36
A review of sebum in mammals in relation to skin diseases, skin function, and the skin microbiome
Vanderwolf, K., Kyle, C., & Davy, C. (2023) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.16680 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- PENCE, D. B., & UECKERMANN, E.
- Venue
- Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'OIE
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 385-398
- ISSN
- 0253-1933 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4295827630
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sarcoptic mange in wildlife: -EN- -FR- -ES-. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.20506/rst.21.2.1335
- The paper
- PENCE, D. B., & UECKERMANN, E. (2002). Sarcoptic mange in wildlife: -EN- -FR- -ES-. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'OIE. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.21.2.1335
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.