The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dyeing sludge-derived biochar for efficient removal of malachite green from dyeing wastewater
Abstract
In light of the rapid advancement of the dyeing industry, the resultant environmental contamination from extensive dye utilization and the subsequent sludge generated by the treatment of dyeing wastewater has escalated, prompting broad apprehension. This study employed the response surface methodology to explore the iodine adsorption capacity of pyrolyzed dyeing sludge peat treated with ZnCl2 [ZnCl2 modified sludge biochar (ZSC)] as the adsorbent material for optimization of the parameters for ZSC preparation. The analysis of the variance of the response surface methods indicated that the pyrolysis temperature emerged as the most pivotal factor. The maximum adsorption capacity of malachite green (MG) by ZSC reached up to 224.0962 mg/g. Moreover, the adsorptive efficacy of ZSC on MG was evaluated under varying environmental conditions, showcasing that the optimal parameters facilitated a remarkable MG removal efficiency of 99.13%. Even after five cycles of reuse, ZSC maintained a substantial decolorization capability of 45% for MG. Characterization of ZSC through scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) indicated a high specific surface area of 495.38 m2/g and the presence of reactive functional groups (–OH and C–O). The adsorption process, upon thermodynamic and kinetic evaluation, aligned more closely with the Langmuir isotherm model and the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Mechanistic adsorption results revealed that electrostatic attraction, pore-filling, hydrogen bonding, and π-π stacking interactions collectively accounted for the elevated MG removal efficacy by the ZSC. This study represents a promising approach, transforming waste into a treatment solution with the dual purpose of dye removal and resource reclamation from dyeing sludge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The OAE study argued that converting dyeing sludge into biochar recovers resources and reduces the volume of hazardous waste disposed of [3].”
From Biomass-Derived Biochar for The Removal of Textile Dyes from Aqueous Solutions: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, ZnCl₂-activated dyeing sludge biochar showed high surface area (495 m²/g) and a maximum malachite green adsorption capacity of 224 mg/g [3].”
From Biomass-Derived Biochar for The Removal of Textile Dyes from Aqueous Solutions: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“ZnCl₂ activation of dyeing sludge biochar produced a surface area of 495 m²/g and improved pore development [3].”
From Biomass-Derived Biochar for The Removal of Textile Dyes from Aqueous Solutions: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- 10.19965/j.cnki.iwt.2021-0433 · DOI
- 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2417.2023.05.019 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms23094752 · DOI
- 10.3390/toxics12020111 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.etap.2024.104382 · DOI
- 10.3390/w15061172 · DOI
- 10.3390/nano13081350 · DOI
- 10.1039/d1ra04049a · DOI
- 10.3390/pr9081329 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167975 · DOI
- 10.1002/wer.1437 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11356-023-29102-7 · DOI
- 10.3390/molecules28083410 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129463 · DOI
- 10.3390/ma11081407 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111892 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.132684 · DOI
- 10.1080/09593330.2022.2077130 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125333 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.spc.2023.11.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169035 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137929 · DOI
- 10.12030/j.cjee.201710068 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.059 · DOI
- 10.3390/ma17040942 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126864 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.177 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105085 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127747 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.071 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jece.2022.107632 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115338 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.022 · DOI
- Liang X, Ning X, Lin C. Optimization of preparation conditions for activated carbons from textile dyeing sludge and sawdust using response surface methodology based on CCD. Chin J Environ Eng 2014;8:4937-42. Available from: http://hjhx.rcees.ac.cn/en/article/id/20141161?viewType=HTML. [Last accessed on 24 Jul 2024]
- 10.1016/j.jobab.2023.10.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117053 · DOI
- 10.2166/wst.2023.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118518 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cej.2022.136942 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104939 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12205-020-0593-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.022 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2019.104394 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wse.2023.03.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.125096 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120738 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wri.2014.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100832 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105951 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101556 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124587 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105218 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150885 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103713 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124413 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133764 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123292 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137108 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167816 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127680 · DOI
- 10.13578/j.cnki.issn.1671-1556.20211469 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11356-024-32308-y · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biomass-Derived Biochar for The Removal of Textile Dyes from Aqueous Solutions: A Review
Srijayathi, I., Boddupally, M., Qaiyum, M. A., & Ramesh, G. V. (2026) · EPJ Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/epjconf/202635602007
Metadata
- Authors
- Qian, W., Deng, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Fang, Y., Li, X., Liang, J., & Liu, H.
- Venue
- Water Emerging Contaminants & Nanoplastics
- Publisher
- OAE Publishing Inc.
- Published
- 2024-07-25
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2831-2597
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
