Cited by 7Seed and Plant BiochemistrySensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsFood composition and properties

Sensory quality characteristics of gluten-free products prepared with germinated quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Wild)

Open access
Srujana, Naga Sai, Kumari, B. Anila, Maheswari, K. Uma, Devi, K.B. Suneetha, Suneetha, W. Jessie·2017·International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Abstract

Germination can be used to improve the sensory properties of cereal and pseudo-cereal grains. Quinoa is rich in minerals, vitamins, fibre and high amounts of protein of a high nutritional value. This study examined the effects of germinated quinoa substitutions on at various proportions on sensory properties of traditional recipes of India ladoo (sweet) and chapathies (unleavened Indian flat bread). Five types of formulations of products were prepared with germinated quinoa flour ranging from 25, 50, 75 and 100%. These products were evaluated for sensory attributes. Laddu prepared with 100% ragi flour, chapathi prepared with 50% of wheat flour and 50% of Jowar flour was served as control. Sensory data indicated that the ladoo and chapathi with up to 25% of germinated quinoa flour were acceptable, while additional germinated quinoa flour resulted in a decreased mean score for overall acceptability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.419

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 7

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Yuvarani, S., and Anitha, V. 2016. A study on the consumer acceptance, nutritive value and antioxidant activity of multigrain ladoo. International Journal of Home Science. 2(3): 227-232.

Authors
Srujana, N. S., Kumari, B. A., Maheswari, K. U., Devi, K. B. S., & Suneetha, W. J.
Affiliations
Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University (IN)
Venue
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences
Published
2017-08-10
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
3507-3514
ISSN
  • 2319-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 2319-7706
OpenAlex
W2749977226
Cited by
7
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
Keywords
quinoa, gluten-free foods, sensory acceptability, wheat flour, ragi flour

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review