Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

‘Decolonising the university curriculum’

L, Le Grange·2016·South African Journal of Higher Education

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20853/30-2-709

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Ashcroft, B., G. Griffiths and H. Tiffin. 2000. Post-colonial studies: The key concepts. London: Routledge.
  2. DeCarvalho, J. J. and J. Flórez-Flórez. 2014. The meeting of knowledges: A project for the decolonisation of the university in Latin America. Postcolonial Studies 17(2): 122-139.
  3. Dei, G. 2000. Rethinking the role of indigenous knowledges in the academy. International Journal of Inclusive Education 4(2): 111-132.
  4. Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari. 1994. What is Philosophy? H. Tomlinson and G. Burchell (Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
  5. Gough, N. 2011. A complexivist view of higher education: Implications for curriculum design and research on teaching and learning. Invited keynote address at the 5 th annual university teaching and learning conference. Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal, 26-28 September.
  6. Guattari, F. 2001. The three ecologies. Trans. Ian Pindar and Paul Sutton. London: The Athlone Press.
  7. Le Grange, L. 2007. Integrating western and indigenous knowledge systems: The basis for effective science education in South Africa? International Review of Education 53(5-6): 577-591.
  8. Le Grange, L. 2014. Currere's active force and the africanisation of the university curriculum. South African Journal of Higher Education 28(4): 1284-1294.
  9. Le Grange, L. 2015. Currere's active force and the concept of Ubuntu. Keynote address at the triennial conference of the International Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies (IAACS). University of Ottawa. 26-30 May.
  10. Odora-Hoppers, C. and H. Richards. 2011. Rethinking thinking: Modernity's 'other' and the transformation of the university. Pretoria: Unisa Press.
  11. Pinar, W. F. 2011. The character of curriculum studies: Bildung, currere and the recurring question of the subject. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
  12. Pindar, I. and P. Sutton. 2001. Translators' introduction. In The three ecologies, ed. F. Guattari. Translated by I. Pindar and P. Sutton. London: The Athlone Press.
  13. Turnbull, D. 1997. Reframing science and other local knowledge traditions. Futures 29(6): 551-562.
  14. Wallin, J. J. 2010. A Deleuzian approach to curriculum: Essays on a pedagogical life. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
L, L. G.
Venue
South African Journal of Higher Education
Published
2016-06
Volume
30
Issue
2
ISSN
1753-5913
Cited by
159
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review