El modelo de los cinco grandes factores de personalidad y el uso problemático de Internet en jóvenes colombianos
Open accessAbstract
El objetivo del estudio fue relacionar las dimensiones básicas de personalidad formuladas por el modelo de los cinco grandes factores con el uso problemático de Internet, en una muestra de 411 jóvenes colombianos de 18 a 28 años de tres universidades privadas. Se les administraron online: el cuestionario de datos socio-demográficos y hábitos de uso de Internet, el Big Five Inventory (John, Donahue y Kentle, 1991), para evaluar la personalidad y el Internet Addiction Test (Young, 1998), para determinar el grado de uso de Internet (controlado, problemático o adictivo). Los resultados revelaron que el 9.7% de la muestra presenta un uso problemático de Internet. Este porcentaje era en su mayoría masculino (χ2= 12.93; p= 0.01) y realizaba actividades de comunicación y ocio. El uso problemático correlaciona positivamente con neuroticismo y negativamente con afabilidad y responsabilidad. Por otra parte, no tiene relación con extraversión y apertura a la experiencia. Ser mujer y la dimensión de responsabilidad son factores protectores del uso problemático, mientras que el neuroticismo lo predice. En conclusión, los datos aportan evidencia empírica en el estudio de la relación entre la personalidad y el uso problemático de Internet.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Extraversion maintains a direct relationship with problematic cell-phone use, whereas this relationship is inverse with respect to the Internet.
“Two perspectives can be appreciated here: extraversion maintains a direct relationship with problematic cell-phone use, whereas this relationship is inverse with respect to the Internet (133).”
From Cell-phone addiction: a review (2016) · cites this paper as [133]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 41
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Fossati, S., Borroni, S., Marchione, D. y Maffei, C. (2011). The Big Five Inventory (BFI). Reliability and validity of Italian translation in three independent nonclinical samples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 50-58.
- Hamburger, Y. A. y Ben-Artzi, E. (2000). The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 441-449. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632 (00). · DOI
- Liu, Q., Xiao, S., Cao, H., Xu, H., Zhou, L. y Luo, D. (2009). Relationship between personality characteristics and quality of life in college students with different extent of Internet use. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 23, 138-142.
- McCrae, R. R. y Costa, P. T. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. En O. P. John, R. W. Robins and L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 182-207). New York: Guilford Press.
- Moreno, M., Jelenchick, L., Cox, E., Young, H. y Christakis, D. (2011). Problematic Internet use among US youth: A systematic review. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medi- cine, 165, 797-805. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2011. · DOI
- Triandis, H. C. y Eunkook, M. S. (2002). Cultural influenc- es on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 133- 160.
- Viñas, F. (2009). Self-reported use of Internet among ado- lescents: Psychological profile of elevated Internet use. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Thera- py, 9, 109-122.
- Wolfradt, U. y Doll, J. (2001). Motives of adolescents to use the Internet as a function of personality traits, perso- nal and social factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24, 13-27. doi: 10.2190/ANPM-LN97-AU97- AUT2-D2EJ. · DOI
- Authors
- Puerta-Cortés, D. X., & Carbonell, X.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Ibagué (CO)
- Universitat Ramon Llull (ES)
- Venue
- Adicciones
- Publisher
- Socidrogalcohol
- Published
- 2014-03-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-61
- ISSN
- 0214-4840 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4293633680
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Adicciones (publishedVersion)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion)
- Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Keywords
- problematic internet use, internet addiction, Big Five personality traits, neuroticism, agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, openness to experience, young adults, gender differences, protective factors, Colombian youth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
