Fungal resistance to echinocandins and the MDR phenomenon in Candida glabrata
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3390/jof4030105 · Paper page
Abstract
Candida glabrata has thoroughly adapted to successfully colonize human mucosal membranes and survive in vivo pressures prior to and during antifungal treatment. Out of all the medically relevant Candida species, C. glabrata has emerged as a leading cause of azole, echinocandin, and multidrug (MDR: azole + echinocandin) adaptive resistance. Neither mechanism of resistance is intrinsic to C. glabrata, since stable genetic resistance depends on mutation of drug target genes, FKS1 and FKS2 (echinocandin resistance), and a transcription factor, PDR1, which controls expression of major drug transporters, such as CDR1 (azole resistance). However, another hallmark of C. glabrata is the ability to withstand drug pressure both in vitro and in vivo prior to stable ‘genetic escape’. Additionally, these resistance events can arise within individual patients, which underscores the importance of understanding how this fungus is adapting to its environment and to drug exposure in vivo. Here, we explore the evolution of echinocandin resistance as a multistep model that includes general cell stress, drug adaptation (tolerance), and genetic escape. The extensive genetic diversity reported in C. glabrata will be highlighted.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 105 · Cited by 194
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Castanheira M, Deshpande LM, Davis AP, Rhomberg PR, and Pfaller MA. Monitoring Antifungal Resistance in a Global Collection of Invasive Yeasts and Molds: Application of CLSI Epidemiological Cutoff Values and Whole-Genome Sequencing Analysis for Detection of Azole Resistance in Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017, 61: 10.1128/AAC.00906-17. · DOI
- Mazur P and Baginsky W. In vitro activity of 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase requires the GTP-binding protein Rho1. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 14604-9.
- Markovich S, Yekutiel A, Shalit I, Shadkchan Y, and Osherov N. Genomic approach to identification of mutations affecting caspofungin susceptibility in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004, 48: 3871-6. 10.1128/AAC.48.10.3871- 3876.200448/10/3871 [pii]. · DOI
- Mazur P, Morin N, Baginsky W, el-Sherbeini M, Clemas JA, Nielsen JB, and Foor F. Differential expression and function of two homologous subunits of yeast 1,3-beta-D- glucan synthase. Mol Cell Biol. 1995, 15: 5671-81.
- Cormack BP, Ghori N, and Falkow S. An adhesin of the yeast pathogen Candida glabrata mediating adherence to human epithelial cells. Science. 1999, 285: 578-82. 7617 [pii].
- Kakeya H, Miyazaki Y, Miyazaki H, Nyswaner K, Grimberg B, and Bennett JE. Genetic analysis of azole resistance in the Darlington strain of Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000, 44: 2985-90.
- Ben-Ami R, Zimmerman O, Finn T, Amit S, Novikov A, Wertheimer N, Lurie-Weinberger M, and Berman J. Heteroresistance to Fluconazole Is a Continuously Distributed Phenotype among Candida glabrata Clinical Strains Associated with In Vivo Persistence. MBio. 2016, 7: 10.1128/mBio.00655-16. · DOI · Paper page
- Dodgson AR, Pujol C, Denning DW, Soll DR, and Fox AJ. Multilocus sequence typing of Candida glabrata reveals geographically enriched clades. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41: 5709-17.
- Authors
- Healey, K., & Perlin, D. S.
- Affiliations
- William Paterson University (US)
- Rutgers Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Healey, Kelley
- Perlin, David S
- Venue
- Journal of Fungi
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-08-17
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 105-105
- ISSN
- 2309-608X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6162769
- OpenAlex
- W2889229333
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 105
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Fungi (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (2r01ai109025-11, AI109025)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI-109025)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Keywords
- Candida glabrata, echinocandin resistance, multidrug resistance, azole resistance, antifungal drug tolerance, FKS1, FKS2, PDR1, CDR1, drug transporters, cellular stress, genetic diversity, fungal adaptation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review