SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Central Nervous System of a 1-Year-Old Infant Submitted to Complete Autopsy
Open accessAbstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was initially characterized as a respiratory illness. Neurological manifestations were reported mostly in severely affected patients. Routes for brain infection and the presence of virus particles in situ have not been well described, raising controversy about how the virus causes neurological symptoms. Here, we report the autopsy findings of a 1-year old infant with COVID-19. In addition to pneumonitis, meningitis and multiple organ damage related to thrombosis, a previous encephalopathy may have contributed to additional cerebral damage. SARS-CoV-2 infected the choroid plexus, ventricles, and cerebral cortex. This is the first evidence of SARS-CoV-2 detection in an infant post-mortem brain.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SARS-CoV-2 seems to invade infants' brains, since immunohistochemical analysis of the postmortem brain of a 1-year-old infant showed positive staining in the choroid plexus, ventricles and cerebral cortex.
“SARS-CoV-2 also seems to invade infants’ brains, since immunohistochemical analysis of the postmortem brain of a 1-year-old infant showed positive staining in the choroid plexus, ventricles and cerebral cortex [27].”
From Hyperactivation of P2X7 receptors as a culprit of COVID-19 neuropathology (2021) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 51
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [32]Lun MP Monuki ES Lehtinen MK. Development and functions of the choroid plexus-cerebrospinal fluid system Nat Rev Neurosci 16 2015 445 457 26174708 PMC4629451
- Authors
- Gomes, I. C., Karmirian, K., Oliveira, J., Pedrosa, C., Rosman, F. C., Chimelli, L., & Rehen, S.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
- D’Or Institute for Research and Education (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Rehen, Stevens
- Venue
- The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-09-13
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 100046-100046
- ISSN
- 2667-193X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8397543
- OpenAlex
- W3198225422
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Lancet Regional Health - Americas (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, pediatric COVID-19, central nervous system infection, choroid plexus, viral neurotropism, blood-CSF barrier, brain histopathology, neuronal loss, cortical atrophy, viral pneumonia, autopsy findings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review