The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oocyte Vitrification for Fertility Preservation in Women with Benign Gynecologic Disease: National Clinical Practice Guidelines Developed by a Modified Delphi Consensus Process
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3390/jcm10173810 · Paper page
Abstract
International guidelines are published in oncology to provide standardized information and fertility preservation (FP) care for adults and children with cancer. For benign gynecologic diseases (BGD), many recommendations are based on data coming from oncofertility studies rather than studies with a stronger and broader evidence base. The purpose of the study was to conduct a modified Delphi process for generating FP guidelines for BGD. A steering committee identified 42 potential FP practices for BGD. Then 114 key stakeholders were asked to participate in a modified Delphi process via two online survey rounds and a final meeting. Consensus was reached for 28 items. Among them, stakeholders rated age-specific information concerning the risk of diminished ovarian reserve after surgery as important but rejected proposals setting various upper and lower age limits for FP. All women should be informed about the benefit/risk balance of oocyte vitrification, in particular about the likelihood of live birth according to age. FP should not be offered in rASRM stages I and II endometriosis without endometriomas. These guidelines could be useful for gynecologists to identify situations at risk of infertility and to better inform women with BGDs who might need personalized counseling for FP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
When more is not better: 10 ‘don’ts’ in endometriosis management. An ETIC* position statement
Club, E. E. T. I., Alio, L., Angioni, S., Arena, S., Bartiromo, L., Bergamini, V, Berlanda, N., Bonin, C., Busacca, M., Candiani, M., et al. (2019) · Human Reproduction Open · doi:10.1093/hropen/hoz009 · Cited by 64
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Courbiere, B., Le Roux, E., Mathieu d’Argent, E., Torre, A., Patrat, C., Poncelet, C., Montagut, J., Gremeau, A.-S., Creux, H., Peigné, M., Chanavaz-Lacheray, I., Dirian, L., Fritel, X., Pouly, J.-L., & Fauconnier, A.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (FR)
- Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-07-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3810-3810
- ISSN
- 2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8432013
- OpenAlex
- W3180791917
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Keywords
- oocyte vitrification, fertility preservation, benign gynecologic disease, endometriosis, ovarian reserve, benefit-risk balance, endometrioma, infertility risk, Delphi consensus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review