PreprintCited by 19Workplace Violence and BullyingIntimate Partner and Family ViolencePolicing Practices and Perceptions

The role of organizational culture in normalizing paramedic exposure to violence

Open access
Mausz, Justin, Johnston, Mandy, Donnelly, Elizabeth·2022·Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research

Abstract

Purpose Violence against paramedics is a complex – but underreported – problem. Extant research suggests organizational culture may play a role in sustaining cultural norms that downplay the significance and limit reporting. Our objective was to qualitatively explore paramedics’ experience with violence, with particular emphasis on understanding how organizational culture contributes to under-reporting. Approach We surveyed paramedics from a single, large, urban service in Ontario, Canada, asking participants to describe their experiences with violence, including whether – and why or why not – the incidents were reported. Within a constructivist epistemology, we used inductive thematic analysis with successive rounds of coding to identify and then define features of organizational culture that limit reporting. Findings A total of 196 (33% of eligible) paramedics completed the survey. Fully 98% of participants disclosed having experienced some form of violence; however only a minority (40%) reported the incidents to management, or the police (21%). We defined a framework within which a lack of support from management, and consequences for offenders, implicitly positions the ability of paramedics to “brush off” violent encounters as an expected professional competency. Disclosing emotional or psychological distress in response to violent encounters invited questions as to whether the individual is personally suited to paramedic work. Originality While the extant research has indicated that underreporting is a problem, our findings shed light on why – a critical first step in addressing what has been described as a serious public health problem.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20944/preprints202201.0279.v1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Notable environmental or assignment-related hazards for paramedics include an increased prevalence of violence and threats, which has reached a point where it might be expected and even normalised.

    “Notable environmental or assignment-related hazards are an increased prevalence of violence and threats towards paramedics [8], which has reached a point where it might be expected and even normalised [51].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 19

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Charmaz, K. (2014a). Focused coding and beyond. In J. Seaman (Ed.), Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed., pp. 138-161). Sage Publications. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 19 January 2022 doi:10.20944/preprints202201.0279.v1
  2. Charmaz, K. (2014b). The logic of grounded theory coding practices and initial coding. In J. Seaman (Ed.), Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed., pp. 109-137). Sage Publications.
  3. Charmaz, K. (2014c). Memo-writing. In J. Seaman (Ed.), Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed., pp. 162-191). Sage Publications.
  4. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Philosophical assumptions and interpretive frameworks. In L. Habib (Ed.), Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3 ed., pp. 15-41). SAGE Publications.

Authors
Mausz, J., Johnston, M., & Donnelly, E.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Windsor (CA)
Venue
Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-01-19
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
112-122
ISSN
1759-6599 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200410211
Cited by
19
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research (publishedVersion)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
Keywords
organizational culture, paramedics, underreporting of violence, workplace violence, psychological distress, professional competence, management support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review