PreprintCited by 7Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Application of machine learning in the quantitative analysis of surface characteristics of highly abundant cytoplasmic proteins: Toward AI-based biomimetics

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.3390/biomimetics9030162

Abstract

Proteins in the crowded environment of human cells have often been studied regarding nonspecific interactions, misfolding, and aggregation, which may cause cellular malfunction and disease. Specifically, proteins with high abundance are more susceptible to these issues due to the law of mass action. Therefore, the surfaces of highly abundant cytoplasmic (HAC) proteins directly exposed to the environment can exhibit specific physicochemical, structural, and geometrical characteristics that reduce nonspecific interactions and adapt to the environment. However, the quantitative relationships between the overall surface descriptors still need clarification. Here, we used machine learning to identify HAC proteins using hydrophobicity, charge, roughness, secondary structures, and B-factor from the protein surfaces and quantify the contribution of each descriptor. First, several supervised learning algorithms were compared to solve binary classification problems for the surfaces of HAC and extracellular proteins. Then, logistic regression was adopted for the feature importance analysis of descriptors considering model performance (80.2% accuracy and 87.6% AUC) and interpretability. The HAC proteins showed positive correlations with negatively and positively charged areas but negative correlations with hydrophobicity, B-factor, beta structure proportion, roughness, and disordered regions proportion. Finally, the details of each descriptor could be explained concerning adaptative surface strategies of HAC proteins to regulate nonspecific interactions, protein folding, flexibility, stability, and adsorption. This study presented a novel approach using various surface descriptors to identify HAC proteins and provided quantitative design rules for the surfaces well-suited to human cellular crowded environments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20944/preprints202312.1187.v1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Schematic representation of key processes in the functional prediction and quantitative analysis of surface physicochemical, structural, and geometrical descriptors on protein surfaces. HAC: highly abundant cytoplasmic; SES: solvent-excluded surface; SAS: solvent accessible surface.
Figure 1 Schematic representation of key processes in the functional prediction and quantitative analysis of surface physicochemical, structural, and geometrical descriptors on protein surfaces. HAC: highly abundant cytoplasmic; SES: solvent-excluded surface; SAS: solvent accessible surface.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Average predicted local distance difference test value distribution of the 668 collected proteins.
Figure 2 Average predicted local distance difference test value distribution of the 668 collected proteins.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 PC coefficients among the descriptors from the training set.
Figure 3 PC coefficients among the descriptors from the training set.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 (a) Comparison of the performance of different ML algorithms. KNN: K-Nearest Neighbor; RF: Random Forest; LR: logistic regression; and SVM: Support Vector Machine. (b) ROC curves for the four machine learning algorithms from a single-shot trial. The hyperparameters used to tune each model in a single-shot trial are described in Table S2.
Figure 4 (a) Comparison of the performance of different ML algorithms. KNN: K-Nearest Neighbor; RF: Random Forest; LR: logistic regression; and SVM: Support Vector Machine. (b) ROC curves for the four machine learning algorithms from a single-shot trial. The hyperparameters used to tune each model in a single-shot trial are described in Table S2.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Importance of surface descriptors in classifying proteins into HAC and extracellular proteins. Error bars denote the standard deviation of five randomly split training and test sets, performed to prevent sampling bias and overfitting.
Figure 5 Importance of surface descriptors in classifying proteins into HAC and extracellular proteins. Error bars denote the standard deviation of five randomly split training and test sets, performed to prevent sampling bias and overfitting.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 (a) Boxplots of the average surface hydrophobicity of extracellular and HAC proteins. (b) Boxplots of the proportion of secondary structures of the extracellular and HAC proteins (AH: alpha-helix; BS: beta structure; and DO: disordered region) in the surface and buried regions. (c) Hydrophobicity scale of 20 kinds of amino acids. (d) Proportion of amino acids in the surface and buried regions of proteins.
Figure 6 (a) Boxplots of the average surface hydrophobicity of extracellular and HAC proteins. (b) Boxplots of the proportion of secondary structures of the extracellular and HAC proteins (AH: alpha-helix; BS: beta structure; and DO: disordered region) in the surface and buried regions. (c) Hydrophobicity scale of 20 kinds of amino acids. (d) Proportion of amino acids in the surface and buried regions of proteins.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Boxplots of (a) the average surface B-factors on the surface and buried regions, (b) the fraction of positively charged and negatively charged surface area on extracellular and HAC proteins, and (c) the net surface charge of extracellular and HAC Proteins.
Figure 7 Boxplots of (a) the average surface B-factors on the surface and buried regions, (b) the fraction of positively charged and negatively charged surface area on extracellular and HAC proteins, and (c) the net surface charge of extracellular and HAC Proteins.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 8 Boxplots of the surface roughness of extracellular and HAC proteins.
Figure 8 Boxplots of the surface roughness of extracellular and HAC proteins.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Moon, J., Hu, G., & Hayashi, T.
Affiliations
Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
Corresponding author
Hayashi, Tomohiro
Venue
Biomimetics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-12-15
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
162-162
ISSN
2313-7673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392518014
Cited by
7
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomimetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Tokyo Tech Research Repository (Tokyo Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP 22H04530, JP23H04059, 23H04059)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
surface descriptors, protein hydrophobicity, protein charge, surface roughness, Debye-Waller factor, protein secondary structure, intrinsically disordered regions, protein folding, protein stability, protein adsorption, protein crowding, extracellular proteins, feature importance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review