The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Imaging Modalities and the Role of Artificial Intelligence
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3390/diagnostics14040438
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common malignant tumor of the pancreas, carrying a poor prognosis, in most cases patients being diagnosed in a nonresectable stage. Image-based artificial intelligence (AI) models implemented in tumor detection, segmentation and classification could improve diagnosis with better treatment options and increased survival. This review included papers published in the last 5 years and describes the current trends in AI algorithms used in PDAC. We analyzed the applications of AI in detection of PDAC, segmentation of the lesion and classification algorithms used in differential diagnosis, prognosis, and histopathological and genomic prediction. The results show lack of multi-institutional collaboration and stresses the need for bigger datasets in order for AI models to be implemented in a clinically relevant manner.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures




Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To the best of our knowledge, until now there has been a lack of studies in the literature on using MRI radiomics data for the differentiation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma from normal pancreatic tissue [7,8,9].”
In the citing paper
“Few reviews discuss the latest developments in AI for pancreatic cancer diagnosis using cross-sectional imaging techniques, with most focusing on CT [7,8,9,25,26,27].”
In the citing paper
“Recent advances include the application of deep learning techniques like convolutional neural networks (CNNs), transformer-based models, and new architectures that focus on handling various types of pancreatic lesions, segmenting multiple organs and tumors, and integrating auxiliary information [7,8,9,24,25,26].”
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 117 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Anghel, C., Mugur, G. C., Anghel, D. A., Rusu-Munteanu, G. I., Dumitru, R. L., & Lupescu, I. G.
- Affiliations
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
- Institutul Clinic Fundeni (RO)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diagnostics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-01-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 438-438
- ISSN
- 2075-4418 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10887967
- OpenAlex
- W4391883983
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diagnostics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, artificial intelligence, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, tumor detection, lesion segmentation, tumor classification, differential diagnosis, outcome prediction, genomic prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Imaging Modalities and the Role of Artificial Intelligence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.20944/preprints202401.0904.v1
- The paper
- Anghel, C., Mugur, G. C., Anghel, D. A., Rusu-Munteanu, G. I., Dumitru, R. L., & Lupescu, I. G. (2024). Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Imaging Modalities and the Role of Artificial Intelligence. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0904.v1