A Review of Current Trends, Techniques, and Challenges in Large Language Models (LLMs)
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3390/app14052074
Abstract
Natural language Processing (NLP) has significantly transformed in the last decade, especially in the field of Language Modeling. Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved SOTA performances on Natural Language Understanding (NLU) and Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks by learning language representation in self-supervised ways. This paper provides a comprehensive survey to capture the progression of advances in Language Models. In this paper, we examine the different aspects of Language Models, which started with a few million parameters but have reached the size of a trillion in a very short time. We also look at how these LLMs transitioned from task-specific to task-independent to task-and-language-independent architectures. This paper extensively discusses different pre-training objectives, benchmarks, and transfer learning methods used in LLMs. It also examines different fine-tuning and In-Context learning techniques used in downstream tasks. It also explores how LLMs can perform well across many domains and datasets if sufficiently trained on a large and diverse dataset. Next, it discusses how, over time, the availability of cheap computational power and large datasets have improved LLM’s capabilities and raised new challenges. As part of our study, we also inspect LLMs from the lens of scalability to see how their performance is affected by the model’s depth, width, and data size. Lastly, we provide an empirical comparison of existing trends and techniques and a comprehensive analysis of where the field of LLM currently stand.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LLMs require substantial memory, processing power, and storage, often relying on high-end GPUs or specialized hardware like TPUs for training and inference.
“LLMs require substantial memory, processing power, and storage space [14], often relying on high-end GPUs or specialized hardware like TPUs (Tensor Processing Units) for both training and inference [15].”
From Tiny Language Models for Automation and Control: Overview, Potential Applications, and Future Research Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 114 · Cited by 296
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., and Dean, J. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality,Advances in neural information processing systems, 26, 2013.
- Pennington, J., Socher, R., and Manning, C. D. Glove: Global vectors for word representation,In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP), pp. 1532-1543, 2014.
- McCann, B., Bradbury, J., Xiong, C., and Socher, R. Learned in translation: Contextualized word vectors,Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
- Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, Ł. & Polosukhin, I. Attention is all you need,Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
- Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W. & Liu, P. J. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer,The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(1), pp. 5485-5551, 2020.
- Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., & Sutskever, I. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,OpenAI blog, 1(8), 9, 2019.
- Brown. T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J.D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A. & Agarwal, S. Language models are few-shot learners,Advances in neural information processing systems, 33, pp.1877-1901, 2020.
- Stiennon, N., Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Ziegler, D., Lowe, R., Voss, C., Radford, A., Amodei, D. and Christiano, P.F., Learning to summarize with human feedback,Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, pp.3008-3021, 2020.
- Zhao, Z., Wallace, E., Feng, S., Klein, D. and Singh, S., Calibrate before use: Improving few-shot performance of language models,In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 12697-12706. PMLR, 2021.
- Houlsby, N., Giurgiu, A., Jastrzebski, S., Morrone, B., De Laroussilhe, Q., Gesmundo, A., Attariyan, M. and Gelly, S., Parameter-efficient transfer learning for NLP,In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 2790-2799, PMLR, 2019.
- Wang, T., Roberts, A., Hesslow, D., Le Scao, T., Chung, H.W., Beltagy, I., Launay, J. and Raffel, C., What language model architecture and pretraining objective works best for zero-shot generalization?,In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 22964-22984. PMLR, 2022.
- Authors
- Patil, R., & Gudivada, A. V.
- Affiliations
- Grand Valley State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Patil, Rajvardhan
- ORCID
- Patil, Rajvardhan
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-02-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2074-2074
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392358084
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 91 · 2025: 178 · 2024: 27
- FWCI
- 43.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- large language models, language modeling, self-supervised learning, natural language understanding, natural language generation, pre-training objectives, transfer learning, fine-tuning, in-context learning, domain generalization, model scalability, model size, benchmarking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review