The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the SARS-CoV-2-Human Liver Interactome Using a Comprehensive Analysis of the Individual Virus-Host Interactions.
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3390/livers4020016 · Paper page
Abstract
Many metabolic processes at the molecular level support both viral attack strategies and human defenses during Covid-19. This knowledge is of vital importance in the design of antiviral drugs. In this study, we extracted 18 articles (2021-2023) from PubMed reporting the discovery of hub-nodes specific for the liver during covid-19, identifying 142 hub-nodes. They are highly connected proteins from which to get deep functional information on viral strategies when used as functional seeds. Therefore, we evaluated the functional and structural significance of each of them to endorse their reliable use as seeds. After filtering, the remaining 111 hubs were used to get by STRING an enriched interactome of 1111 nodes (13,494 interactions). It shows the viral strategy in the liver is to attack the entire cytoplasmic translational system, including ribosomes, to take control of protein bio-synthesis. We used the SARS2-Human-Proteome Interaction Database (33,791 interactions), de-signed by us with BioGRID data to implement a reverse-engineering process that identified human proteins actively interacting with viral proteins. The results show 57% of human liver proteins di-rectly involved in Covid, a strong impairment of the ribosome and spliceosome, an antiviral defense mechanism against cellular stress of the p53 system, and, surprisingly, a viral capacity for multiple protein attacks against single human proteins that reveal underlying evolutionary-topological molecular mechanisms. Viral behavior over time suggests different molecular strategies for different organs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Colonna, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Colonna, Giovanni
- ORCID
- Colonna, Giovanni
- Venue
- Livers
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-02-13
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-239
- ISSN
- 2673-4389 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4396575546
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Livers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, liver, hub proteins, protein-protein interaction, ribosome, protein synthesis, spliceosome, p53, antiviral defense, antiviral drug targets
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review