PreprintCited by 28Topic ModelingInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

CRP-RAG: A Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Supporting Complex Logical Reasoning and Knowledge Planning

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.3390/electronics14010047

Abstract

The Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Framework enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by retrieving relevant knowledge to broaden their knowledge boundaries and mitigate factual hallucinations stemming from knowledge gaps. However, the RAG Framework faces challenges in effective knowledge retrieval and utilization; invalid or misused knowledge will interfere with LLM generation, reducing reasoning efficiency and answer quality. Existing RAG methods address these issues by decomposing and expanding queries, introducing special knowledge structures, and using reasoning process evaluation and feedback. However, the linear reasoning structures limit complex thought transformations and reasoning based on intricate queries. Additionally, knowledge retrieval and utilization are decoupled from reasoning and answer generation, hindering effective knowledge support during answer generation. To address these limitations, we propose the CRP-RAG framework, which employs reasoning graphs to model complex query reasoning processes more comprehensively and accurately. CRP-RAG guides knowledge retrieval, aggregation, and evaluation through reasoning graphs, dynamically adjusting the reasoning path based on evaluation results and selecting knowledge-sufficiency paths for answer generation. Experimental results show that CRP-RAG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art LLMs and RAG baselines in three reasoning and question answering tasks, demonstrating superior factual consistency and robustness compared to existing RAG methods.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20944/preprints202411.1648.v1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 28

Metadata

Authors
Xu, K., Zhang, K., Li, J., Huang, W., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Yanshan University (CN)
  • Tencent (China) (CN)
  • Beijing Technology and Business University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Jingyuan
  • Wang, Yuanzhuo
Venue
Electronics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-11-21
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
47-47
ISSN
2079-9292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405810201
Cited by
28
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Electronics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
retrieval-augmented generation, reasoning graphs, knowledge retrieval, multi-hop reasoning, fact-checking, factual hallucination, large language models, knowledge aggregation, open-domain question answering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review