The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unravelling the Barriers: Current Limitations in Cancer Biology Research and How to Overcome Them
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3390/cancers17132102
Abstract
- Cancer research faces significant biological, technological, and systemic limitations that hinder the development of effective therapies and improved patient outcomes. Traditional preclinical models such as 2D and 3D cell cultures, murine xenografts, and organoids, often fail to reflect the complexity of human tumor architecture, microenvironment, and immune interactions. This disconnects results in promising laboratory findings, not always translating effectively into clinical success. A core obstacle is tumor heterogeneity, characterized by diverse genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic variations within tumors, which complicates treatment strategies and contributes to therapeutic resistance. Current early detection technologies lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity, impeding timely diagnosis. The tumor microenvironment, with its intricate interactions and resistance-promoting factors, further promotes treatment failure. Additionally, we only partially understand the biological processes driving metastasis, limiting therapeutic advances. Overcoming these barriers involves not only the use of new methodological approaches and advanced technologies, but also requires a cultural effort by researchers. Many cancer studies are still essentially observational. While acknowledging their significance, it is crucial to recognize the shift from deterministic to indeterministic paradigms in biomedicine over the past two to three decades, a transition facilitated by systems biology. It has opened the doors of deep metabolism where the functional processes that control and regulate cancer progression operate. Beyond biological barriers, systemic challenges include limited funding, regulatory complexities, and disparities in cancer care access across different populations. These socio-economic factors exacerbate research stagnation and hinder the translation of scientific innovations into clinical practice. Overcoming these obstacles requires multidisciplinary collaborations, advanced modeling techniques that better emulate human cancer, and innovative technologies for early detection and targeted therapy. Strategic policy initiatives must address systemic barriers, promoting health equity and sustainable research funding. While the complexity of cancer biology and systemic challenges are formidable, ongoing scientific progress and collaborative efforts inspire hope for breakthroughs that can transform cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival outcomes worldwide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How many human proteoforms are there?
Aebersold, R., Agar, J. N., Amster, I. J., Baker, M. S., Bertozzi, C. R., Boja, E. S., Costello, C. E., Cravatt, B. F., Fenselau, C., Garcia, B. A., et al. (2018) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.2576 · Cited by 907
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Colonna, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Colonna, Giovanni
- ORCID
- Colonna, Giovanni
- Venue
- Cancers
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2025-05-23
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2102-2102
- ISSN
- 2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12248693
- OpenAlex
- W4411611554
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 12
- FWCI
- 6.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cancers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Science, Research, and Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- translational research, tumor heterogeneity, drug resistance, cancer stem cells, tumor microenvironment, metastasis, early cancer detection, preclinical models, organoids, systems biology, cancer metabolism, health equity, research funding, access to cancer care, multidisciplinary collaboration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review