PreprintCited by 9Network Security and Intrusion DetectionSoftware System Performance and ReliabilityDigital and Cyber Forensics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

LogRESP-Agent: A Recursive AI Framework for Context-Aware Log Anomaly Detection and TTP Analysis

Open access
Lee, JuYoung, Jeong, YeonSu, Han, TaeHyun, Lee, TaeJin·2025·Applied Sciences

Preprint — published as 10.3390/app15137237

Abstract

As cyber threats become increasingly sophisticated, existing log-based anomaly detection models face critical limitations in adaptability, semantic interpretation, and operational automation. Traditional approaches based on CNNs, RNNs, and LSTMs struggle with inconsistent log formats and often lack interpretability. To address these challenges, we propose LogRESP-Agent, a modular AI framework built around a reasoning-based agent for log-driven security prediction and response. The architecture integrates three core capabilities, including (1) LLM-based anomaly detection with semantic explanation, (2) contextual threat reasoning via Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and (3) recursive investigation capabilities enabled by a planning-capable LLM agent. This architecture supports automated, multi-step analysis over heterogeneous logs without reliance on fixed templates. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach on both binary and multi-class classification tasks. On the Monster-THC dataset, LogRESP-Agent achieved 99.97% accuracy and 97.00% F1-score, while also attaining 99.54% accuracy and 99.47% F1-score in multi-class classification using the EVTX-ATTACK-SAMPLES dataset. These results confirm the agent's ability to not only detect complex threats but also explain them in context, offering a scalable foundation for next-generation threat detection and response automation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20944/preprints202506.0235.v1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 38 · Cited by 9

Metadata

Authors
Lee, J., Jeong, Y., Han, T., & Lee, T.
Affiliations
Gachon University (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, TaeJin
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-06-04
Volume
15
Issue
13
Pages
7237-7237
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411887300
Cited by
9
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (RS-2024-00354169, RS-2023-00235509)
  • Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (00235509, RS-2023-00235509)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital and Cyber Forensics
Keywords
log anomaly detection, threat intelligence, retrieval-augmented generation, LLM agents, explainable security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LogRESP-Agent: A Recursive AI Framework for Context-Aware Log Anomaly Detection and TTP Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.20944/preprints202506.0235.v1
The paper
Lee, J., Jeong, Y., Han, T., & Lee, T. (2025). LogRESP-Agent: A Recursive AI Framework for Context-Aware Log Anomaly Detection and TTP Analysis. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202506.0235.v1