The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
LogRESP-Agent: A Recursive AI Framework for Context-Aware Log Anomaly Detection and TTP Analysis
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3390/app15137237
Abstract
As cyber threats become increasingly sophisticated, existing log-based anomaly detection models face critical limitations in adaptability, semantic interpretation, and operational automation. Traditional approaches based on CNNs, RNNs, and LSTMs struggle with inconsistent log formats and often lack interpretability. To address these challenges, we propose LogRESP-Agent, a modular AI framework built around a reasoning-based agent for log-driven security prediction and response. The architecture integrates three core capabilities, including (1) LLM-based anomaly detection with semantic explanation, (2) contextual threat reasoning via Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and (3) recursive investigation capabilities enabled by a planning-capable LLM agent. This architecture supports automated, multi-step analysis over heterogeneous logs without reliance on fixed templates. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach on both binary and multi-class classification tasks. On the Monster-THC dataset, LogRESP-Agent achieved 99.97% accuracy and 97.00% F1-score, while also attaining 99.54% accuracy and 99.47% F1-score in multi-class classification using the EVTX-ATTACK-SAMPLES dataset. These results confirm the agent's ability to not only detect complex threats but also explain them in context, offering a scalable foundation for next-generation threat detection and response automation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Hybrid IDS architectures that combine line-rate ML detectors with gateway-resident LLMs for triage are gaining traction because they balance latency (tens of milliseconds) with reasoning capacity [16,68,74,87].”
From Agentic AI and Large Language Models for Autonomous IoT Cybersecurity: A Systematic Survey, Taxonomy, and Research Roadmap (2026) · cites this paper as [87]
In the citing paper
“across the full 153-paper corpus, only five studies (≈3%)- [22,71,125] for error propagation and [26,87] for tool-use amplification-report observing a compound failure mode at all”
From Agentic AI and Large Language Models for Autonomous IoT Cybersecurity: A Systematic Survey, Taxonomy, and Research Roadmap (2026) · cites this paper as [87]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, J., Jeong, Y., Han, T., & Lee, T.
- Affiliations
- Gachon University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, TaeJin
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2025-06-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 7237-7237
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4411887300
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (RS-2024-00354169, RS-2023-00235509)
- Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (00235509, RS-2023-00235509)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital and Cyber Forensics
- Keywords
- log anomaly detection, threat intelligence, retrieval-augmented generation, LLM agents, explainable security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LogRESP-Agent: A Recursive AI Framework for Context-Aware Log Anomaly Detection and TTP Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.20944/preprints202506.0235.v1
- The paper
- Lee, J., Jeong, Y., Han, T., & Lee, T. (2025). LogRESP-Agent: A Recursive AI Framework for Context-Aware Log Anomaly Detection and TTP Analysis. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202506.0235.v1