Cited by 162Global trade and economicsEconomic Growth and ProductivityEconomic and Technological Innovation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Controlling for Heterogeneity in Gravity Models of Trade and Integration

Abstract

This paper argues that it is necessary to allow for country-pair heterogeneity when using the gravity model to estimate international trade flows. We propose and estimate a fixed-effects model that eliminates the heterogeneity bias inherent in standard methods. Further, we show that there is no statistical support for the restrictions necessary to obtain existing empirical models, which are special cases of our model. Because the gravity model has become the 'workhorse' baseline model for estimating the effects of international integration, this has important empirical implications. In particular, our results suggest that standard gravity estimates of the effects of integration can differ a great deal from what is obtained when heterogeneity is accounted for.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20955/r.87.49-64

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cheng, I.-H., & Wall, H. J.
Affiliations
  • National University of Kaohsiung (TW)
  • Lindenwood University (US)
Venue
Review
Published
2005
Volume
87
Issue
1
OpenAlex
W3123095336
Cited by
162
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Technological Innovation
Keywords
gravity model of trade, fixed effects model, international trade flows, international trade integration, heterogeneity bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review