Cited by 19Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesNutrition and Health in AgingDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Menus offered in long-term care homes: quality of meal service and nutritional analysis

Open access
Rodríguez Rejón, Ana Isabel, Ruiz López, María Dolores, Malafarina, Vincenzo, Puerta, Antonio, Zuñiga, Antonia, Artacho, Reyes·2017·Nutrición Hospitalaria

Abstract

Background Institutionalization is a risk factor for malnutrition. Low energy intake and/or nutrient deficiencies are considered to be the main causes. Objective To evaluate the quality of meals and meal service as well as the nutritional value of the main menus (regular menu, menu for diabetics, and pureed menu) offered in three long-term care (LTC) homes located in the metropolitan area of Granada (Spain). Methods Cross-sectional study. A validated "quality of meals and meal service" set of indicators was applied. The menus were assessed by weighed food records on 14 consecutive days. The results were compared with the dietary reference intakes (DRIs) and the recommended number of servings. Results Important deficiencies in the quality of meals and meal service have been reported. Average energy varies from 1,788 to 2,124 kcal/day in the regular menus, from 1,687 to 1,924 kcal/day in the menus for diabetics, and from 1,518 to 1,639 kcal/day in the pureed menus. Average protein varied from 71.4 to 75.4 g/day, from 72.6 to 76.1 g/day, and from 50.5 to 54.7 g/day, respectively. None of the menus complied with the recommendations for fiber, potassium, magnesium, iodine, vitamin D, vitamin E, folate, nor for vegetables, fruit, milk products, olive oil, legumes, or nuts. Conclusions It is necessary to ensure the implementation of regular routines for controlling the quality of meals and meal service as well as the nutritional value of the menus offered in LTC homes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20960/nh.941

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodríguez Rejón, A. I., Ruiz López, M. D., Malafarina, V., Puerta, A., Zuñiga, A., & Artacho, R.
Venue
Nutrición Hospitalaria
Published
2017-06-05
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
584
ISSN
  • 0212-1611 (ISSN-L)
  • 1699-5198
OpenAlex
W2710204128
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Nutrición Hospitalaria (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
long-term care facilities, institutionalized elderly, malnutrition, meal quality, meal service, energy intake, protein intake, nutritional deficiency, diabetic diet, pureed diet, Dietary Reference Intakes, food diary
MeSH terms
Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dietary Services, Humans, Menu Planning, Nursing Homes, Spain, Nutrition Assessment, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Meals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review