A Beginner’s Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis
Open accessAbstract
The following paper discusses exploratory factor analysis and gives an overview of the statistical technique and how it is used in various research designs and applications. A basic outline of how the technique works and its criteria, including its main assumptions are discussed as well as when it should be used. Mathematical theories are explored to enlighten students on how exploratory factor analysis works, an example of how to run an exploratory factor analysis on SPSS is given, and finally a section on how to write up the results is provided. This will allow readers to develop a better understanding of when to employ factor analysis and how to interpret the tables and graphs in the output. The broad purpose of factor analysis is to summarize data so that relationships and patterns can be easily interpreted and understood. It is normally used to regroup variables into a limited set of clusters based on shared variance. Hence, it helps to isolate constructs and concepts. Note that both Sean Pearce and An Gie Yong should be considered as first authors as they contributed equally and substantially in the preparation of this manuscript. The authors would like to thank Dr. Louise Lemyre and her team, Groupe d’Analyse Psychosociale Santé (GAP-Santé), for their generous feedback; in particular, Dr. Lemyre who took the time to provide helpful suggestions and real world data for the tutorial. The authors would also like to thank Levente Orbán and Dr. Sylvain Chartier for their guidance. The original data collection was funded by PrioNet
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EFA seeks to discover complex trends by analyzing the dataset and testing predictions, while CFA tries to validate hypotheses and uses path analysis diagrams to represent variables and factors.
“EFA seeks to discover complex trends by analyzing the dataset and testing predictions, while CFA tries to validate hypotheses and uses path analysis diagrams to represent variables and factors [143].”
From Data Science and Analytics: An Overview from Data-Driven Smart Computing, Decision-Making and Applications Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as [143]
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) are the two most popular factor analysis techniques.
“Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) are the two most popular factor analysis techniques.”
From Data Science and Analytics: An Overview from Data-Driven Smart Computing, Decision-Making and Applications Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as [143]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 29 · Cited by 3,304
- Authors
- Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- ORCID
- Yong, An Gie
- Venue
- Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology
- Published
- 2013-10-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 79-94
- ISSN
- 1913-4126 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2183877827
- Cited by
- 3,304
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 223 · 2025: 287 · 2024: 366 · 2023: 404 · 2022: 422 · 2021: 421 · 2020: 343 · 2019: 302 · 2018: 221 · 2017: 176 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 62.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Education › Diverse Academic Research Areas
- Keywords
- exploratory factor analysis, factor rotation, SPSS, research design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review