AMERICAN CHESTNUT AS A FUTURE RESOURCE TO ENHANCE MINE RECLAMATION PRODUCTIVITY
Open accessAbstract
Mine reclamation sites can be difficult to reforest, and trees that successfully establish on these sites are often comprised of relatively undesirable species.American chestnut (Castanea dentata) once dominated the forests throughout much of the coal-producing region in Appalachia.However, the exotic fungus Cryphonectria parasitica was discovered in 1904 and within several decades, the blight killed nearly every tree throughout the range.A dedicated breeding program sponsored by The American Chestnut Foundation has made tremendous progress toward producing a blight-resistant variety of American chestnut by hybridizing with the blight-resistant Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima).It is expected that a blight-resistant hybrid chestnut tree (~94% American chestnut) will be available for reintroduction within the next decade, providing a new species option for reclamation programs.Due to continued presence of the fungus throughout eastern forests, few studies have examined American chestnut growth performance in plantations.However, a recent study on a blight-free site in Wisconsin reported exceptional growth capacity of chestnut relative to co-occurring hardwood species.Sufficient evidence also exists to suggest that American chestnut may tolerate many of the stressful physical and chemical soil characteristics typical of mine reclamation sites.Rapid growth, adaptability to a wide range of environmental conditions, good timber quality, and exceptional wildlife properties make American chestnut a highly desirable potential species for future reclamation programs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Ecological succession and the rehabilitation of disturbed terrestrial ecosystems
Wali, M. K. (1999) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1004475206351 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Properties of minesoil reclaimed for forest land use
Bussler, B. H., Byrnes, W. R., Pope, P. E., & Chaney, W. R. (1984) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800010033x · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vegetation Communities of a Coal Reclamation Site in Southeastern Ohio
Cavender, N., Byrd, S., Bechtoldt, C. L., & Bauman, J. M. (2014) · Northeastern Naturalist · doi:10.1656/045.021.0104 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Plantation performance of chestnut hybrids and progenitors on reclaimed Appalachian surface mines
Skousen, J. G., Dallaire, K., Scagline-Mellor, S., Monteleone, A., Wilson-Kokes, L., Joyce, J., Thomas, C., Keene, T., DeLong, C., Cook, T., et al. (2018) · New Forests · doi:10.1007/s11056-018-9643-7 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“The Appalachian coal mining region corresponds closely with the native range of the American chestnut (Jacobs 2004; FieldsJohnson et al.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, P. U., & Jacobs, D. F.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jacobs, Douglass F.
- ORCID
- Jacobs, Douglass F.
- Venue
- Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation
- Published
- 2005-06-30
- Volume
- 2005
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 512-523
- ISSN
- 2328-8744 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2184623807
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2018: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Seedling growth and survival studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Social Sciences › Law › Geology and Environmental Impact Studies
- Keywords
- American chestnut, Castanea dentata, mine reclamation, reforestation, Cryphonectria parasitica, chestnut blight, blight resistance, Castanea mollissima, tree growth performance, soil tolerance, coal mining, Appalachian forests, wood quality, wildlife habitat
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review