Cited by 5Seedling growth and survival studiesForest ecology and managementGeology and Environmental Impact Studies

AMERICAN CHESTNUT AS A FUTURE RESOURCE TO ENHANCE MINE RECLAMATION PRODUCTIVITY

Open access
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, Jacobs, Douglass F.·2005·Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation

Abstract

Mine reclamation sites can be difficult to reforest, and trees that successfully establish on these sites are often comprised of relatively undesirable species.American chestnut (Castanea dentata) once dominated the forests throughout much of the coal-producing region in Appalachia.However, the exotic fungus Cryphonectria parasitica was discovered in 1904 and within several decades, the blight killed nearly every tree throughout the range.A dedicated breeding program sponsored by The American Chestnut Foundation has made tremendous progress toward producing a blight-resistant variety of American chestnut by hybridizing with the blight-resistant Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima).It is expected that a blight-resistant hybrid chestnut tree (~94% American chestnut) will be available for reintroduction within the next decade, providing a new species option for reclamation programs.Due to continued presence of the fungus throughout eastern forests, few studies have examined American chestnut growth performance in plantations.However, a recent study on a blight-free site in Wisconsin reported exceptional growth capacity of chestnut relative to co-occurring hardwood species.Sufficient evidence also exists to suggest that American chestnut may tolerate many of the stressful physical and chemical soil characteristics typical of mine reclamation sites.Rapid growth, adaptability to a wide range of environmental conditions, good timber quality, and exceptional wildlife properties make American chestnut a highly desirable potential species for future reclamation programs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21000/jasmr05010512

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, P. U., & Jacobs, D. F.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Jacobs, Douglass F.
Venue
Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation
Published
2005-06-30
Volume
2005
Issue
1
Pages
512-523
ISSN
2328-8744 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2184623807
Cited by
5
References
2
Citations by year
2018: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Seedling growth and survival studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
  • Social Sciences › Law › Geology and Environmental Impact Studies
Keywords
American chestnut, Castanea dentata, mine reclamation, reforestation, Cryphonectria parasitica, chestnut blight, blight resistance, Castanea mollissima, tree growth performance, soil tolerance, coal mining, Appalachian forests, wood quality, wildlife habitat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review