SWITCHGRASS POTENTIAL ON RECLAIMED SURFACE MINES FOR BIOFUEL PRODUCTION IN WEST VIRGINIA
Abstract
The high cost and environmental risks associated with non-renewable energy sources has caused an increased interest in, and development of renewable biofuels. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), a warm season perennial grass, has been investigated as a source of biofuel feedstock due to its high biomass production on marginal soils, its tolerance of harsh growing conditions, and its ability to provide habitat for wildlife and soil conservation cover. West Virginia contains vast expanses of reclaimed surface mine lands and could potentially benefit from the production of switchgrass as a biofuel feedstock. Furthermore, switchgrass production could satisfy Surface Mining Reclamation and Control Act of 1977 (SMCRA) requirements for reclamation bond release to mine operators. Three separate studies will be discussed in this thesis to determine if switchgrass grown on reclaimed surface mines can produce yields similar to yields from stands grown under normal agronomic conditions and what common surface mining reclamation practices may be most appropriate for growing switchgrass. The first study examined yield production of three commercially-available, upland switchgrass varieties grown on two reclaimed surface mines in production years two, three and four. The Hampshire Hill mine site, which was reclaimed in the late 1990s using top soil and treated municipal sludge, averaged 5,800 kg (ha-yr)-1 of switchgrass compared to 803 kg (ha-yr)-1 at the Hobet 21 site which was reclaimed wi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Marra and Skousen (2012) found that switchgrass on reclaimed land with topsoil produced yields of nearly 7,000 kg/ha, but yields were three times lower (2,000 kg/ha) on reclaimed lands with no topsoil.
“They found that switchgrass on reclaimed land with topsoil produced yields of nearly 7,000 kg ha -1 , but yields were three times lower (2,000 kg ha -1 ) on reclaimed lands with no topsoil.”
From RECLAMATION OF MINED LAND WITH SWITCHGRASS, MISCANTHUS, AND ARUNDO FOR BIOFUEL PRODUCTION (2013) · cites this paper as Marra and Skousen, 2012
Switchgrass stands do not develop fully until after the third growing season.
“Switchgrass stands do not develop fully until after the third growing season (Marra and Skousen, 2012).”
From RECLAMATION OF MINED LAND WITH SWITCHGRASS, MISCANTHUS, AND ARUNDO FOR BIOFUEL PRODUCTION (2013) · cites this paper as Marra and Skousen, 2012
No abnormal weather conditions occurred during 2011 that should have hindered growth.
“No abnormal weather conditions occurred during 2011 that should have hindered growth (Marra, 2012).”
From Switchgrass Yield on Reclaimed Surface Mines for Bioenergy Production (2013) · cites this paper as Marra, 2012
Cites
Switchgrass Biomass Production in the Midwest USA: Harvest and Nitrogen Management
Vogel, K. P., Brejda, J. J., Walters, D. T., & Buxton, D. R. (2002) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2002.0413 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Long-term yield potential of switchgrass-for-biofuel systems
Fike, J. H., Parrish, D. J., Wolf, D. D., Balasko, J. A., Green, J. T., Rasnake, M., & Reynolds, J. H. (2006) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.10.006 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Porter, C. L. (1966) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1935646 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Fike, J. H., Parrish, D. J., Wolf, D. D., Balasko, J. A., Green, J. T., Rasnake, M., & Reynolds, J. H. (2006) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.10.008 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Cultivar × Environment Interactions in Switchgrass
Casler, M. D., & Boe, A. R. (2003) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2003.2226 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Biomass Yield and Nutrient Responses of Switchgrass to Phosphorus Application
Kering, M. K., Biermacher, J. T., Butler, T. J., Mosali, J., & Guretzky, J. A. (2012) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-011-9174-y · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Establishing and managing switchgrass as an energy crop
Parrish, D. J. (2008) · Forage and Grazinglands · doi:10.1094/fg-2008-0220-01-rv · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Switchgrass Yield on Reclaimed Surface Mines for Bioenergy Production
Marra, M., Keene, T., Skousen, J., & Griggs, T. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2012.0453 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationRECLAMATION OF MINED LAND WITH SWITCHGRASS, MISCANTHUS, AND ARUNDO FOR BIOFUEL PRODUCTION
West Virginia University, M. W. 2., Skousen, J., Keene, T., Marra, M., & Gutta, B. (2013) · Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation · doi:10.21000/jasmr13010177 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Marra, M., & Skousen, J.
- ORCID
- Skousen, Jeff
- Venue
- Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation
- Published
- 2012-06-30
- Volume
- 2012
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 325-346
- ISSN
- 2328-8744 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103267250
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal American Society of Mining and Reclamation (publishedVersion)
- ProQuest Demo Repository (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Keywords
- switchgrass, biofuel feedstock, biomass yield, mine reclamation, Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act, nitrogen fertilization, mulch, seedling establishment, marginal soils, West Virginia, Shawnee
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review