The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF FLEXURAL AND CRACKING BEHAVIOR OF POLYPROPYLENE FIBER REINFORCED LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE BEAMS
Open accessAbstract
This study experimentally evaluates the effect of polypropylene fiberincorporation on the flexural performance and cracking behavior ofstructural lightweight concrete beams. The lightweight concrete wasproduced using locally available lightweight aggregates with a targetcompressive strength of 25 MPa and a water-cement ratio of 0.41.Polypropylene fibers were added at a dosage of 0.45% by volume ofconcrete. The experimental program included compressive strength,splitting tensile strength, flexural strength, and crack width tests. A totalof 10 cylindrical specimens and 6 reinforced lightweight concrete beamspecimens measuring 200 × 300 × 1800 mm were prepared and tested.All specimens were water-cured for 28 days before testing. The resultsshowed that polypropylene fibers improved the mechanical and crackingperformance of structural lightweight concrete. The compressivestrength increased from 23.73 MPa to 24.81 MPa, while the splittingtensile strength increased from 2.09 MPa to 2.31 MPa. In addition, theflexural strength increased from 3.28 MPa to 3.51 MPa. The addition ofpolypropylene fibers also reduced the maximum crack width from 0.75mm to 0.47 mm and produced narrower and more uniformly distributedcracks along the beam span, indicating improved crack resistance andpost-cracking behavior. The novelty of this study lies in the experimentalinvestigation of crack propagation and flexural behavior of structurallightweight concrete beams incorporating polypropylene fibers usinglocally sourced lightweight aggregates under three-point loadingconditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Purnawirati, I. G. A. N., & Herlambang, F. S.
- Affiliations
- Politeknik Negeri Bali (ID)
- Politeknik Negeri Semarang (ID)
- Venue
- Jurnal PenSil
- Publisher
- Universitas Negeri Jakarta
- Published
- 2026-05-31
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 206-218
- ISSN
- 2301-8437 (ISSN-L)
- 2623-1085
- OpenAlex
- W7163410835
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Jurnal PenSil (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Fire effects on concrete materials
- Keywords
- polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete, lightweight concrete, concrete beams, flexural behavior, crack width, crack resistance, post-cracking behavior, crack propagation, compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, flexural strength, lightweight aggregate, three-point bending
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review