Cited by 41Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

The effect of exercise on maternal complications and birth outcomes in overweight or obese pregnant women: a meta-analysis

Open access
Xing, Yu, Wang, Xin, Zhang, Weiyuan, Jiang, Haili·2020·Annals of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overweight and obesity can increase the risk for certain adverse obstetric outcomes. Exercise may reduce these risks by promoting weight loss or preventing excessive weight gain. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effect of exercise therapy on pregnancy complications and birth outcomes in overweight or obese pregnant women through a meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science for studies on the effects of exercise therapy on pregnancy complications and birth outcomes in overweight or obese pregnant women. The data were analyzed using Stata software for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1,709 pregnant women who met the eligibility criteria were included across 13 studies. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant difference between the exercise group and the control group in regards to gestational weight gain [GWG; standard mean difference (SMD): -0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.32 to -0.10)] and gestational hypertension [GH; risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI were 0.53 (0.32-0.88)]. Contrastingly, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of the other evaluation indicators, including gestational length at delivery, Apgar score at 1 minute and 5 minutes, gestational diabetes, cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, preeclampsia, macrosomia, and neonatal asphyxia. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that exercise can reduce the risk of GWG and the occurrence rate of GH in overweight or obese pregnant women, however, exercise had no effect on birth outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/apm-20-2097

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xing, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, W., & Jiang, H.
Affiliations
Capital Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Jiang, Haili
Venue
Annals of Palliative Medicine
Published
2020-11
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
4103-4112
ISSN
  • 2224-5820 (ISSN-L)
  • 2224-5839
OpenAlex
W3106837697
Cited by
41
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Annals of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
exercise therapy, maternal obesity, overweight in pregnancy, gestational weight gain, gestational hypertension, birth outcomes, preeclampsia, cesarean section, preterm birth, macrosomia, neonatal asphyxia, gestational diabetes mellitus
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Obesity, Pregnancy, Weight Gain, Exercise, Pregnant People, Pregnant Women, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review