Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Driving pressure and mechanical power: new targets for VILI prevention

Open access
Tonetti, Tommaso, Vasques, Francesco, Rapetti, Francesca, Maiolo, Giorgia, Collino, Francesca, Romitti, Federica, Camporota, Luigi, Cressoni, Massimo, Cadringher, Paolo, Quintel, Michael, Gattinoni, Luciano·2017·Annals of Translational Medicine

Abstract

Abstract: Several factors have been recognized as possible triggers of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The first is pressure (thus the ‘barotrauma’), then the volume (hence the ‘volutrauma’), finally the cyclic opening-closing of the lung units (‘atelectrauma’). Less attention has been paid to the respiratory rate and the flow, although both theoretical considerations and experimental evidence attribute them a significant role in the generation of VILI. The initial injury to the lung parenchyma is necessarily mechanical and it could manifest as an unphysiological distortion of the extracellular matrix and/or as micro-fractures in the hyaluronan, likely the most fragile polymer embedded in the matrix. The order of magnitude of the energy required to break a molecular bond between the hyaluronan and the associated protein is 1.12×10-16 Joules (J), 70–90% higher than the average energy delivered by a single breath of 1L assuming a lung elastance of 10 cmH2O/L (0.5 J). With a normal statistical distribution of the bond strength some polymers will be exposed each cycle to an energy large enough to rupture. Both the extracellular matrix distortion and the polymer fractures lead to inflammatory increase of capillary permeability with edema if a pulmonary blood flow is sufficient. The mediation analysis of higher vs. lower tidal volume and PEEP studies suggests that the driving pressure, more than tidal volume, is the best predictor of VILI, as inferred by increased mortality. This is not surprising, as both tidal volume and respiratory system elastance (resulting in driving pressure) may independently contribute to the mortality. For the same elastance driving pressure is a predictor similar to plateau pressure or tidal volume. Driving pressure is one of the components of the mechanical power, which also includes respiratory rate, flow and PEEP. Finding the threshold for mechanical power would greatly simplify assessment and prevention of VILI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/atm.2017.07.08

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Metadata

Authors
Tonetti, T., Vasques, F., Rapetti, F., Maiolo, G., Collino, F., Romitti, F., Camporota, L., Cressoni, M., Cadringher, P., Quintel, M., & Gattinoni, L.
Venue
Annals of Translational Medicine
Published
2017-07
Volume
5
Issue
14
Pages
286-286
ISSN
  • 2305-5839 (ISSN-L)
  • 2305-5847
OpenAlex
W2738116808
Cited by
258
References
34
FWCI
16.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Driving pressure and mechanical power: new targets for VILI prevention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21037/atm.2017.07.08
The paper
Tonetti, T., Vasques, F., Rapetti, F., Maiolo, G., Collino, F., Romitti, F., Camporota, L., Cressoni, M., Cadringher, P., Quintel, M., & Gattinoni, L. (2017). Driving pressure and mechanical power: new targets for VILI prevention. Annals of Translational Medicine. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.07.08

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.