Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictive analytics with gradient boosting in clinical medicine

Open access
written on behalf of AME Big-Data Clinical Trial Collaborative Group, Zhang, Zhongheng, Zhao, Yiming, Canes, Aran, Steinberg, Dan, Lyashevska, Olga·2019·Annals of Translational Medicine

Abstract

Abstract: Predictive analytics play an important role in clinical research. An accurate predictive model can help clinicians stratify risk thereby allowing the identification of a target population which might benefit from a certain intervention. Conventionally, predictive analytics is performed using parametric modeling which comes with a number of assumptions. For example, generalized linear regression models require linearity and additivity to hold for the underlying data. However, these assumptions may not hold in practice. Especially in the era of big data, a large number of covariates or features can be extracted from an electronic database which might have complex interactions and higher-order terms among the covariates. Conventional modeling methods have trouble capturing such high-dimensional relationships. However, some sophisticated machine learning techniques have been invented to handle this situation. Gradient boosting is one of these techniques which is able to recursively fit a weak learner to the residual so as to improve model performance with a gradually increasing number of iterations. It can automatically discover complex data structure, including nonlinearity and high-order interactions, even in the context of hundreds, thousands, or tens-of-thousands of potential predictors. This paper aims to introduce how gradient boosting works. The principles behind this learning machine are explained with a small example in a step-by-step manner. The formal implementation of gradient tree boosting is then illustrated with the caret package. In the simulated example complexity of data structure is created by generating certain interactions between the covariates. This example shows that gradient boosting can better capture these complex relationships than a generalized linear model-based approach.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/atm.2019.03.29

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
written on behalf of AME Big-Data Clinical Trial Collaborative Group, Zhang, Z., Zhao, Y., Canes, A., Steinberg, D., & Lyashevska, O.
Venue
Annals of Translational Medicine
Published
2019-04
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
152-152
ISSN
  • 2305-5839 (ISSN-L)
  • 2305-5847
OpenAlex
W2897124762
Cited by
312
References
8
FWCI
21.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictive analytics with gradient boosting in clinical medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21037/atm.2019.03.29
The paper
written on behalf of AME Big-Data Clinical Trial Collaborative Group, Zhang, Z., Zhao, Y., Canes, A., Steinberg, D., & Lyashevska, O. (2019). Predictive analytics with gradient boosting in clinical medicine. Annals of Translational Medicine. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.03.29

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.