Cited by 10Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsECG Monitoring and AnalysisAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Effectiveness of magnetocardiography to identify patients in need of coronary artery revascularization: a cross-sectional study

Open access
Huang, Xiao, Hua, Ning, Tang, Fakuan, Zhang, Shulin·2020·Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with angina-like symptoms need invasive or non-invasive angiography to determine whether revascularization is necessary. For patients in need of revascularization, undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) may delay the treatment of revascularization and increase exposure to contrast agents and radiation. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to accessed the effectiveness of magnetocardiography (MCG) to identify patients who should undergo coronary revascularization. METHODS: A total of 203 patients who were suffering from angina-like symptoms and underwent percutaneous coronary angiography (PCA) between July 27, 2015 and April 10, 2017 at the 8th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. In all patients, 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) and MCG test were performed before PCA. For each subject. The value at every single sampling point was extracted from T wave of each MCG channel in time sequence. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated for each two T-waves. A binary logistic regression diagnosis model of these coefficients was established to identify patients in need of revascularization. RESULTS: Ten pairings of coefficients were entered into diagnostic regression model as covariates. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was 0.747 (95% CI: 0.680-0.815), and the asymptotic P value was less than 0.001. At the cut-off value of 0.55, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were 72.9%, 65.9%, 74.8%, 63.6% and 69.9%, and the positive and negative post-test probabilities were 65.9% and 25.7%. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for 12-lead ECG were 67.0%, 62.7%, 63.5%, 70.5% and 55.1%, respectively. However, when those acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients were ruled out from both groups, the MCG model had an accuracy of 68.2%, a sensitivity of 70.1%, a specificity of 66.3%, a PPV of 68.5% and an NPV of 67.9%. But, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for 12-lead ECG were 60.0%, 55.2%, 65.1%, 62.3% and 58.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients suffering from angina-like symptoms, with a logistic regression model value over 0.55, should be recommended for PCA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/cdt-20-121

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is increasing evidence that progress in magnetic sensor technology combined with more advanced signal denoising methods is rapidly reaching the requirements for near-future availability of several novel device variants for budget-price unshielded MCG.

    “Instead, as concerns most routine clinical MCG applications, there is an increasing evidence that progress in magnetic sensor technology combined with more advanced signal denoising methods is rapidly reaching the requirements for the near-future availability of several novel device variants for budget-price unshielded MCG, covering the needs of different deployment scenarios, from ED triage for”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 10

Authors
Huang, X., Hua, N., Tang, F., & Zhang, S.
Affiliations
  • Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Hua, Ning
  • Tang, Fakuan
Venue
Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy
Published
2020-08
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
831-840
ISSN
  • 2223-3652 (ISSN-L)
  • 2223-3660
OpenAlex
W3049287653
Cited by
10
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
General Hospital of People’s Liberation Army
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
magnetocardiography, coronary revascularization, angina pectoris, percutaneous coronary angiography, 12-lead ECG, diagnostic accuracy, acute myocardial infarction, non-invasive diagnosis, coronary artery disease, logistic regression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review