Breast biopsy techniques in a global setting—clinical practice review
Open accessAbstract
Breast cancer is a disease of global concern, regardless of economic status. A significant disparity in breast cancer care between low- and high-income countries is not unexpected, but consideration can be given to particular aspects of therapy to allow as much equitability as possible. One of these aspects involves biopsy of breast lesions. With available resources, management in developed countries focuses on dealing with screening and image-detected lesions. In such circumstances, advanced percutaneous biopsy techniques are utilized liberally. However, where resources are less forthcoming for mammographic screening, women frequently present with symptomatic, palpable and larger tumours. This scenario behooves the clinician to modify treatment approaches and yet use cost-effective management strategies. It is essential that thought is applied to breast biopsy technique used where there is cost-consciousness as it significantly influences subsequent therapy. Less expensive strategies like fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy (CNB), when performed with particular attention to technique, handling, transportation and preparation of biopsy specimens allows a high level of accuracy and provides adequate information for the next steps in treatment. This mini-review discusses the variation in biopsy approaches among lower and higher income areas and offers suggestions for appropriate breast biopsy strategies in resource-limited countries.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FNABs are recommended as the primary diagnostic modality in palpable breast lesions in many LMICs.
“FNABs are recommended as the primary diagnostic modality in palpable breast lesions in many LMICs.28”
From Fine needle aspiration biopsy in low‐ and <scp>middle‐income</scp> countries (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
The Discussion’s proposed algorithm recommends FNAC as the primary diagnostic modality for palpable lesions where resources are extremely limited and radiology and radiotherapy are unavailable. It does not establish that this recommendation applies across many LMICs; where imaging is available, it says FNAC should follow imaging. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFNAB has gained popularity in LMICs for evaluating breast lesions due to its cost-effectiveness and high diagnostic accuracy.
“The FNAB has also gained popularity in LMICs for evaluating breast lesions due to its cost-effectiveness and high diagnostic accuracy.”
From Fine needle aspiration biopsy in low‐ and <scp>middle‐income</scp> countries (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
The Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) section describes FNAC as cost-effective and reports diagnostic accuracy comparable to core needle biopsy; it also identifies its potential value in low- and middle-income countries. It does not say FNAC has gained popularity there. Instead, it discusses diminished use and suggests reviving routine use. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 12
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- [1]Wilkinson L Gathani T. Understanding breast cancer as a global health concern. Br J Radiol 2022; 95: 20211033. 10.1259/bjr.20211033 34905391 PMC8822551 · DOI
- [2]Mall S Noakes J Kossoff M Can digital breast tomosynthesis perform better than standard digital mammography work-up in breast cancer assessment clinic?. Eur Radiol 2018; 28: 5182- 94. 10.1007/s00330-018-5473-4 29846804 · DOI
- [3]Smith MJ Heffron CC Rothwell JR Fine needle aspiration cytology in symptomatic breast lesions: still an important diagnostic modality? Breast J 2012; 18: 103- 10. 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01223.x 22404050 · DOI
- [4]Sayed S Ngugi AK Nwosu N Training health workers in clinical breast examination for early detection of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 4: CD012515. 37070783 PMC10122521
- [5]Vlastos G Verkooijen HM. Minimally invasive approaches for diagnosis and treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Oncologist 2007; 12: 1- 10. 10.1634/theoncologist.12-1-1 17227896 · DOI
- [6]Wang M He X Chang Y A sensitivity and specificity comparison of fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in evaluation of suspicious breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 2017; 31: 157- 66. 10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.009 27866091 · DOI
- [7]Masood S Rosa M Kraemer DF Comparative cost-effectiveness of fine needle aspiration biopsy versus image-guided biopsy, and open surgical biopsy in the evaluation of breast cancer in the era of Affordable Care Act: a changing landscape. Diagn Cytopathol 2015; 43: 605- 12. 10.1002/dc.23270 25722099 · DOI
- [8]Kocjan G Bourgain C Fassina A The role of breast FNAC in diagnosis and clinical management: a survey of current practice. Cytopathology 2008; 19: 271- 8. 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00610.x 18821945 · DOI
- [9]Wesoła M Jeleń M. The diagnostic efficiency of fine needle aspiration biopsy in breast cancers - review. Adv Clin Exp Med 2013; 22: 887- 92. 24431319
- [10]El Chamieh C Vielh P Chevret S. Statistical methods for evaluating the fine needle aspiration cytology procedure in breast cancer diagnosis. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22: 40. 10.1186/s12874-022-01506-y 35125097 PMC8818244 · DOI
- [11]Moschetta M Telegrafo M Carluccio DA Comparison between fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy (CNB) in the diagnosis of breast lesions. G Chir 2014; 35: 171- 6. 25174291 PMC4321523
- [12]Berner A Sauer T. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast. Ultrastruct Pathol 2011; 35: 162- 7. 10.3109/01913123.2011.576327 21657816 · DOI
- [13]Field AS Raymond WA Rickard M Breast fine needle aspiration biopsy cytology: the potential impact of the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cytopathology and the use of rapid on-site evaluation. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2020; 9: 103- 11. 10.1016/j.jasc.2019.10.004 32044283 · DOI
- [14]Kazi M, Suhani, Parshad R, et al. Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) in Breast Cancer: A Reappraisal Based on Retrospective Review of 698 Cases. World J Surg 2017; 41: 1528- 33. 10.1007/s00268-017-3906-x 28160027 · DOI
- [15]Bennett IC Saboo A. The Evolving Role of Vacuum Assisted Biopsy of the Breast: A Progression from Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy. World J Surg 2019; 43: 1054- 61. 10.1007/s00268-018-04892-x 30617562 · DOI
- [16]Ciatto S Houssami N Ambrogetti D Accuracy and underestimation of malignancy of breast core needle biopsy: the Florence experience of over 4000 consecutive biopsies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 101: 291- 7. 10.1007/s10549-006-9289-6 16823506 · DOI
- [17]Jackman RJ Burbank F Parker SH Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997; 204: 485- 8. 10.1148/radiology.204.2.9240540 9240540 · DOI
- [18]De la Cruz Ku G Karamchandani M Chambergo-Michilot D Does Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radiotherapy have a Better Survival than Mastectomy? A Meta-Analysis of More than 1,500,000 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29: 6163- 88. 10.1245/s10434-022-12133-8 35876923 · DOI
- [19]Pfob A Dubsky P. The underused potential of breast conserving therapy after neoadjuvant system treatment - Causes and solutions. Breast 2023; 67: 110- 5. 10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.008 36669994 PMC9982288 · DOI
- [20]Kang A Miranda A de Boer B. Manufactured Cell Blocks: Turning Smears into Sections. Acta Cytol 2019; 63: 28- 34. 10.1159/000493907 30612123 · DOI
- [21]Pinto D Schmitt FC. Immunohistochemistry Applied to Breast Cytological Material. Pathobiology 2022; 89: 343- 58. 10.1159/000522542 35367980 · DOI
- [22]Ellis IO Humphreys S Michell M Best Practice No 179. Guidelines for breast needle core biopsy handling and reporting in breast screening assessment. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57: 897- 902. 10.1136/jcp.2003.010983 15333647 PMC1770422 · DOI
- [23]Dämmrich ME Kreipe HH. Standardized processing of native tissue in breast pathology. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2015; 199: 45- 53. 10.1007/978-3-319-13957-9_5 25636428 · DOI
- [24]Mendoza P Lacambra M Tan PH Fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast: the nonmalignant categories. Patholog Res Int 2011; 2011: 547580. 10.4061/2011/547580 21660275 PMC3108472 · DOI
- Authors
- Silva, E., Meschter, S., & Tan, M. P.
- Affiliations
- Nebraska Medical Center (US)
- Geisinger Medical Center (US)
- Mount Elizabeth Novena Hospital (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Tan, Mona P.
- Venue
- Translational Breast Cancer Research
- Publisher
- AME Publishing Company
- Published
- 2023-04
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 14-14
- ISSN
- 2218-6778 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11093018
- OpenAlex
- W4382700899
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Translational Breast Cancer Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Keywords
- breast biopsy, breast cancer, resource-limited settings, high- and low-income countries, fine needle aspiration cytology, core needle biopsy, cost-effective management, global health equity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review